🐻⬇️🏀

IU Columbus

Season: 2026
Also known as: IU Columbus
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 936 (#376) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More → 989 (#344) HCA +95 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -24.2 (#550) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.001 (#737) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -23.9 More → 0.059 (#657) AdjNet -23.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -23.8 More → 0.055 (#660) AdjNet -23.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.8 | AdjD 84.2 More → 0.171 (#650) AdjO 66.8 | AdjD 84.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 77.5 More → 0.380 (#473) AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 77.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.192 (#535) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.219 (#530) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 896 (#372) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-28 @ Purdue Northwest L 51 - 96

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Aaiden Ashton - 1 26.6 19.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 11.0 12.0 -48 -2.2 -10.4 63.6 62.5 0 -1.03 86.4 86.4
Garrett Clark - 1 28.9 13.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 13.0 -16 -0.8 -3.1 71.4 60.0 0.0 0.15 82.5 92.9
Kwat Abdelkarim - 1 14.8 12.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 10.0 17 0.8 3.9 66.7 60.0 100.0 -0.78 93.2 91.7
Pat Robinson - 1 27.9 10.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.0 19 1.1 31.1 50.0 0.0 57.1 -0.59 55.1 50.0
Davontae Hall - 1 27.3 9.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 14.0 -33 -1.6 -11.8 100.0 100.0 0 0.31 150.0 150.0
Zach Hayslett - 1 21.9 9.0 6.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 8.0 40 3.3 139.1 25.0 25.0 100.0 -0.3 46.1 31.2
Kyle Ross - 1 15.1 8.0 7.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 9.0 -12 -0.6 -2.3 80.0 0 0 -0.18 80.0 80.0
Kevin Taylor - 1 16.5 8.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 12.0 -20 -0.9 -4.8 50.0 50.0 75.0 1.91 69.4 62.5
Andres Arellano Jr. - 1 17.9 5.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 3 0.2 1.4 14.3 0.0 75.0 0.71 28.5 14.3
Drew King - 1 8.8 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Trevon Stoutermire - 1 8.1 1.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 9 1.3 41.0 0 0 25.0 -1.4 28.4 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG