IND Wesleyan
Season:
2026
Also known as: IND Wesleyan Wildcats
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1415 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1354 (#9) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1206 (#10) | HCA +56 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +12.3 (#11) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +7.5 (#251) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.800 (#42) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.848 (#13) | AdjNet +14.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.848 (#13) | AdjNet +14.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.724 (#13) | AdjO 77.1 | AdjD 66.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.714 (#94) | AdjO 76.5 | AdjD 66.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.776 (#125) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.777 (#102) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1314 (#14) | RD 100 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-11 | @ | Millikin | W | 53 - 52 |
| 2026-02-18 | @ | North Park | W | 76 - 71 |
| 2026-02-21 | @ | Augustana (IL) | W | 75 - 56 |
| 2026-02-27 | vs | North Park | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2026-03-06 | vs | Heidelberg | W | 62 - 51 |
| 2026-03-07 | vs | John Carroll | W | 73 - 60 |
| 2026-03-13 | vs | Endicott | W | 83 - 77 |
| 2026-03-19 | @ | Emory | L | 78 - 83 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mason Funk | - | 7 | 31.1 | 22.3 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 15.9 | 16.7 | - | - | - | - | 55.0 | 33.3 | 72.7 | - | 62.1 | 59.5 |
| Noah Cleveland | - | 4 | 26.2 | 17.8 | 10.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 11.2 | 20.2 | - | - | - | - | 57.8 | 0.0 | 61.3 | - | 60.5 | 57.8 |
| Karlo Colak | - | 7 | 35.4 | 14.7 | 7.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 11.1 | 10.3 | - | - | - | - | 47.4 | 26.3 | 96.0 | - | 57.9 | 50.6 |
| Casen Lawrence | - | 7 | 32.2 | 10.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.4 | 6.1 | - | - | - | - | 37.3 | 36.4 | 63.6 | - | 55.6 | 54.2 |
| Brady Kuehl | - | 7 | 17.2 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 5.3 | - | - | - | - | 51.5 | 0.0 | 53.8 | - | 52.9 | 51.5 |
| Jackson Niego | - | 7 | 29.5 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 5.7 | 5.9 | - | - | - | - | 32.5 | 50.0 | 25.0 | - | 42.5 | 43.8 |
| Nathan Boldt | - | 7 | 10.7 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | 83.3 | 50.0 | 83.3 | - | 92.6 | 91.7 |
| Connor Williams | - | 7 | 9.8 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 1.3 | - | - | - | - | 22.2 | 30.0 | 50.0 | - | 31.8 | 30.6 |
| David Williams | - | 7 | 9.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 47.5 | 42.9 |
| Anthony Kemp | - | 7 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.9 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Bradley Biedke | - | 2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Micah Meiss | - | 2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Meyer | - | 6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Alex Miller | - | 6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Tingley | - | 6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Brady Ruggles | - | 6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Dylan Schmidt | - | 6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG