🐻⬇️🏀

Hannibal-Lagrange Trojans

Season: 2024 2016 2013 2012 2011 2010
Also known as: Hannibal-Lagrange Trojans
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

43.0
PPG
94.0
Opp
-45.0
Margin
26.2%
FG%
15.0%
3P%
53.3%
FT%
41.0
RPG
8.0
APG
26.0
TO
93.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 779 (#1074) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 801 (#1076) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 994 (#345) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → -23.4 (#972) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -20.9 (#554) HCA +3.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.7 | AdjD 66.5 More → 0.437 (#462) AdjO 63.7 | AdjD 66.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.133 (#565) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.178 (#561) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 2 More → 888 (#435) RD 350 | GP 2

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-17 @ Northwestern State Demons L 43 - 92
2012-11-26 @ Southeast Missouri State Redhawks L 55 - 96

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Meuel A. Meuel G 1 28.0 12.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 2.0 - - - 40.0 28.6 66.7 - 53.0 50.0
A. Arinyakono A. Arinyakono F 1 27.0 4.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 - - - 16.7 0 40.0 -0.85 24.4 16.7
W. Byrd W. Byrd F 1 17.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 0 -0.65 33.3 33.3
A. McCann A. McCann G 1 12.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 -0.39 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG