Hamilton
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1016 (#211) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1083 (#179) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1042 (#206) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +8.0 (#109) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +8.2 (#229) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.702 (#365) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.657 (#298) | NetEff +4.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.825 (#257) | AdjNet +13.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.825 (#258) | AdjNet +13.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.657 (#272) | AdjO 67.1 | AdjD 60.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.695 (#132) | AdjO 67.3 | AdjD 58.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.700 (#217) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.701 (#212) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1081 (#203) | RD 102 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Salve Regina | W | 79 - 75 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Oswego St. | W | 79 - 62 |
| 2025-11-18 | vs | SUNY Brockport | W | 88 - 64 |
| 2025-11-21 | @ | Hartwick | W | 75 - 23 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | SUNY Oneonta | L | 52 - 59 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Curry | W | 70 - 52 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | SUNY Geneseo | L | 49 - 65 |
| 2025-12-10 | @ | St. Lawrence | L | 73 - 79 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Union (NY) | W | 71 - 68 |
| 2025-12-29 | vs | NYU | L | 48 - 86 |
| 2025-12-30 | @ | VTSU Castleton | W | 59 - 52 |
| 2026-01-11 | @ | Bates | L | 60 - 69 |
| 2026-01-16 | vs | Wesleyan (CT) | W | 63 - 49 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Trinity (CT) | L | 82 - 87 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Amherst | L | 56 - 61 |
| 2026-01-30 | @ | Bowdoin | L | 50 - 59 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Colby | W | 52 - 37 |
| 2026-02-06 | @ | Connecticut Col. | L | 68 - 75 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Tufts | W | 81 - 64 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Lambo | - | 19 | 29.1 | 14.6 | 9.0 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 10.7 | 15.3 | 87 | 4.0 | 36.8 | 55.7 | 12.5 | 65.4 | 0.93 | 58.6 | 55.9 |
| Kendall Harris | - | 18 | 29.7 | 13.6 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 12.0 | 8.9 | 8 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 46.8 | 33.8 | 90.9 | -1.62 | 54.1 | 51.9 |
| Maggie Kernodle | - | 18 | 21.8 | 6.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 39 | 1.9 | 22.3 | 33.3 | 29.0 | 80.0 | 0.87 | 43.1 | 40.0 |
| Annabelle Semeter | - | 19 | 14.9 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 44 | 2.1 | 37.7 | 41.9 | 33.3 | 95.2 | 2.14 | 50.8 | 45.7 |
| Erica Hills | - | 19 | 20.7 | 5.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 77 | 3.5 | 51.1 | 37.6 | 17.5 | 88.5 | -1.21 | 46.5 | 40.8 |
| Abbey Schwoebel | - | 19 | 14.4 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 70 | 3.2 | 42.2 | 50.0 | 0 | 69.0 | 2.11 | 55.9 | 50.0 |
| Hannah Bernstein | - | 15 | 19.9 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 75 | 4.2 | 119.5 | 36.1 | 23.7 | 60.0 | -1.33 | 45.2 | 42.4 |
| Althea Hill | - | 19 | 20.9 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 40.6 | 32.3 | 75.0 | 2.96 | 51.2 | 48.4 |
| Zoe Myslewicz | - | 19 | 10.9 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 30 | 1.4 | 19.4 | 37.1 | 0 | 42.9 | 4.89 | 38.6 | 37.1 |
| Reagan Dowd | - | 17 | 12.9 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 40 | 2.0 | 26.6 | 32.6 | 27.3 | 57.1 | 1.29 | 44.5 | 43.0 |
| Jaylen Manning | - | 12 | 6.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.8 | -0.8 | -11 | -0.8 | -94.6 | 17.6 | 7.1 | 28.6 | -2.02 | 20.2 | 19.1 |
| Alexis Prybyla | - | 10 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | -9 | -0.8 | -68.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.84 | 30.0 | 33.3 |
| Mia Semioli | - | 13 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | -10 | -0.7 | -112.1 | 30.8 | 50.0 | 25.0 | -1.31 | 33.9 | 34.6 |
| Sophie Blomberg | - | 12 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | -5 | -0.4 | -40.4 | 18.8 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.08 | 20.7 | 18.8 |
| Parker Kendall | - | 4 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | -0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.31 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG