Great Lake Christian
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1016 (#311) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1024 (#273) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -42.8 (#415) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -33.6 (#682) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.956 (#194) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.982 (#99) | NetEff +26.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.005 (#686) | AdjNet -46.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.003 (#688) | AdjNet -49.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.065 (#686) | AdjO 45.5 | AdjD 74.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.400 (#538) | AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 69.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.147 (#636) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.172 (#628) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1031 (#271) | RD 249 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-16 | vs | Maranatha Baptist | W | 85 - 60 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalys McGuinnis | - | 1 | 32.0 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 17.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 58.8 | 14.3 | 0 | - | 61.8 | 61.8 |
| MyKenzie Kent | - | 1 | 29.0 | 16.0 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 | - | - | - | 53.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 50.4 | 53.3 |
| MaKensie Mondy | - | 1 | 33.0 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 58.1 | 58.3 |
| Marin Abe | - | 1 | 29.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 60.0 | 50.0 | - | 51.1 | 50.0 |
| Anastasia Douglas | - | 1 | 35.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 27.8 | 27.8 |
| Marionna Dixon | - | 1 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 27.6 | 20.0 |
| O'licia Porritt | - | 1 | 22.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 14.3 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG