Glenville St.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1079 (#69) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1033 (#211) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1121 (#57) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +6.0 (#159) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +14.6 (#104) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.547 (#316) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.979 (#123) | NetEff +36.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.592 (#367) | AdjNet +3.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.631 (#347) | AdjNet +4.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.567 (#360) | AdjO 81.7 | AdjD 78.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.745 (#43) | AdjO 86.3 | AdjD 74.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.764 (#93) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.766 (#82) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1163 (#69) | RD 93 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Claflin | L | 92 - 95 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Livingstone | W | 74 - 59 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Bluefield St. | W | 68 - 67 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Slippery Rock | L | 81 - 92 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | Seton Hill | W | 86 - 76 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Charleston (WV) | L | 88 - 94 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | West Virginia St. | W | 99 - 92 |
| 2025-12-10 | vs | Fairmont St. | L | 75 - 88 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Frostburg St. | L | 85 - 94 |
| 2025-12-17 | @ | Salem (WV) | W | 104 - 72 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Bluefield St. | W | 82 - 78 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Point Park | W | 100 - 73 |
| 2026-01-07 | @ | Davis & Elkins | W | 91 - 86 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | West Va. Wesleyan | W | 99 - 74 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | West Liberty | L | 83 - 94 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Wheeling | L | 80 - 86 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | West Virginia St. | W | 88 - 71 |
| 2026-01-23 | @ | Concord | W | 112 - 100 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Frostburg St. | W | 92 - 67 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Fairmont St. | L | 86 - 101 |
| 2026-02-04 | @ | Point Park | W | 93 - 73 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Salem (WV) | W | 100 - 73 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elijah Redfern | - | 22 | 30.1 | 17.5 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 12.6 | 10.7 | -33 | -1.7 | -11.2 | 49.3 | 41.1 | 76.4 | -0.27 | 60.9 | 57.2 |
| Jalen Knott | - | 22 | 31.9 | 16.9 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 6 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 39.1 | 35.2 | 73.6 | 1.1 | 54.3 | 50.7 |
| Prince Mosengo | - | 22 | 30.3 | 12.5 | 8.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 12.9 | -18 | -0.9 | -7.3 | 61.5 | 50.0 | 70.8 | 0.86 | 65.1 | 62.6 |
| Don Colon-Lewis | - | 22 | 31.5 | 12.2 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 10.5 | 11.6 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 44.3 | 35.2 | 87.0 | 2.52 | 56.0 | 54.1 |
| Ammar Maxwell | - | 22 | 27.4 | 10.6 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 63 | 3.1 | 23.9 | 47.5 | 34.2 | 75.4 | 2.6 | 55.5 | 51.1 |
| Corey Boulden | - | 22 | 15.4 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 72 | 3.4 | 36.2 | 46.4 | 46.9 | 56.2 | 0.96 | 66.4 | 66.5 |
| Rye Gadd | - | 22 | 20.4 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 6.6 | -42 | -2.1 | -22.2 | 47.4 | 36.7 | 71.7 | -1.52 | 62.0 | 56.7 |
| Callum Crossman | - | 16 | 10.1 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 11 | 0.8 | 7.1 | 55.8 | 0 | 59.4 | 0.24 | 58.3 | 55.8 |
| Trey Stump | - | 7 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | -12 | -1.7 | -70.8 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 0 | -0.73 | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Julian Kelly | - | 7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.9 | -12 | -1.7 | -65.9 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 37.5 | 0.11 | 42.0 | 41.7 |
| Garrison Kisner | - | 14 | 7.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | -8 | -0.7 | -27.8 | 33.3 | 23.1 | 0 | -0.42 | 43.3 | 43.3 |
| Jordan Holmes | - | 8 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | -22 | -3.7 | -148.3 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | -0.28 | 23.7 | 20.0 |
| Malachi Greenwich | - | 1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Gavin Burns | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG