Georgia Tech
2006 Team Stats (2 games)
66.0
PPG
71.5
Opp
-5.5
Margin
39.0%
FG%
35.5%
3P%
75.8%
FT%
31.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.5
Adj PPG
51.5
Adj Opp PPG
#45
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 970 (#176) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1081 (#107) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 956 (#216) | HCA +87 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +14.0 (#46) | HCA +3.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +16.3 (#31) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.686 (#91) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.935 (#38) | AdjNet +23.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.939 (#38) | AdjNet +23.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.764 (#45) | AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 51.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.685 (#42) | AdjO 64.1 | AdjD 55.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.758 (#71) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.743 (#70) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1047 (#128) | RD 157 | GP 29 |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-18 | @ | UAB Blazers | W | 68 - 55 |
| 2005-11-20 | vs | Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions | W | 74 - 36 |
| 2005-11-23 | vs | Charleston Cougars | W | 66 - 50 |
| 2005-11-27 | vs | App State Mountaineers | W | 68 - 45 |
| 2005-11-30 | @ | Georgia State Panthers | W | 60 - 53 |
| 2005-12-04 | @ | Georgia Lady Bulldogs | L | 66 - 72 |
| 2005-12-09 | vs | San Diego Toreros | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2005-12-18 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 54 - 38 |
| 2005-12-20 | vs | Longwood Lancers | W | 81 - 41 |
| 2005-12-22 | vs | Troy Trojans | W | 69 - 43 |
| 2005-12-30 | vs | Alabama State Lady Hornets | W | 76 - 46 |
| 2005-12-31 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | W | 57 - 43 |
| 2006-01-05 | vs | Miami Hurricanes | L | 63 - 75 |
| 2006-01-08 | @ | Clemson Tigers | L | 63 - 72 |
| 2006-01-11 | vs | Duke Blue Devils | L | 59 - 67 |
| 2006-01-15 | vs | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 62 - 66 |
| 2006-01-18 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 56 - 85 |
| 2006-01-22 | vs | Wake Forest Demon Deacons | W | 66 - 61 |
| 2006-01-26 | @ | Maryland Terrapins | L | 71 - 79 |
| 2006-01-29 | vs | Clemson Tigers | W | 83 - 64 |
| 2006-02-02 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 54 - 59 |
| 2006-02-05 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 56 - 75 |
| 2006-02-09 | @ | Boston College Eagles | L | 55 - 57 |
| 2006-02-12 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 53 - 65 |
| 2006-02-19 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 54 - 70 |
| 2006-02-23 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 51 - 57 |
| 2006-02-26 | @ | Miami Hurricanes | L | 85 - 90 |
| 2006-03-02 | @ | Miami Hurricanes | W | 79 - 62 |
| 2006-03-03 | @ | Maryland Terrapins | L | 66 - 71 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Ingram
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | - | 39.3 | 60.0 | 50.0 | - | 50.4 | 50.0 |
S. Higgs
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 14.5 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 9.5 | - | - | - | - | 37.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 44.9 | 37.0 |
C. Nnamaka
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | - | 41.2 | 27.3 | 100.0 | - | 56.0 | 50.0 |
K. Terry
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
J. Mitchell
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | -5.0 | - | - | - | - | 8.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 15.5 | 8.3 |
D. Mitchell
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG