Georgia Tech
2019 Team Stats (8 games)
53.4
PPG
69.3
Opp
-14.3
Margin
36.3%
FG%
26.1%
3P%
67.4%
FT%
32.6
RPG
10.0
APG
13.5
TO
74.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2018-2019
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1262 (#135) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1394 (#74) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +28.3 (#105) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.059 (#100) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.054 (#78) | NetEff -22.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.366 (#78) | AdjNet -4.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.367 (#78) | AdjNet -4.7 |
2019 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-13 | @ | Tennessee Volunteers | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2019-01-09 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 49 - 52 |
| 2019-01-26 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2019-01-29 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 54 - 77 |
| 2019-02-02 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 49 - 59 |
| 2019-02-13 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 68 - 76 |
| 2019-02-16 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 47 - 69 |
| 2019-02-27 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 51 - 81 |
| 2019-03-12 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 71 - 78 |
2019 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Devoe
|
G | 9 | 34.0 | 9.4 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 9.2 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 36.1 | 38.9 | 61.1 | - | 46.7 | 44.6 |
A. Gueye
|
F | 9 | 20.6 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 7.6 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | - | 52.5 | 51.5 |
J. Alvarado
|
- | 9 | 33.8 | 8.4 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 10.1 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 26.1 | 57.1 | - | 39.1 | 37.4 |
J. Banks III
|
F | 9 | 29.2 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 6.6 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 0 | 75.0 | -0.71 | 47.9 | 42.4 |
M. Wright IV
|
F | 9 | 17.3 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 16 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 44.2 | 33.3 | 62.5 | 1.14 | 47.7 | 46.2 |
K. Sjolund
|
- | 7 | 12.0 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 45.5 | 100.0 | - | 64.6 | 63.0 |
B. Alston
|
G | 7 | 14.0 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 32.1 | 22.2 | 100.0 | - | 48.1 | 35.7 |
K. Moore
|
- | 9 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 37.0 | 33.3 | 69.2 | - | 48.9 | 42.6 |
E. Cole
|
F | 6 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 31.6 | 14.3 | 66.7 | - | 39.3 | 34.2 |
C. Haywood II
|
G | 7 | 17.7 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 1.1 | -12 | -1.7 | -12.5 | 23.5 | 8.7 | 50.0 | 0.5 | 27.2 | 26.5 |
S. Ogbonda
|
F | 3 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 25.8 | 0.0 |
S. Phillips
|
G | 6 | 7.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.8 | -0.7 | - | - | - | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 8.7 | 9.1 |
S. Medlock
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG