๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Georgia Tech

Also known as: Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
Program History

2013 Team Stats (8 games)

59.8
PPG
72.8
Opp
-13.0
Margin
35.1%
FG%
23.1%
3P%
58.3%
FT%
34.0
RPG
12.3
APG
19.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
69.0
Adj PPG
59.7
Adj Opp PPG
#72
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1083 (#111) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1057 (#120) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +72 elo More โ†’ 977 (#195) HCA +72 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More โ†’ +10.8 (#66) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ +9.5 (#70) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.505 (#154) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +17.6 More โ†’ 0.884 (#65) AdjNet +17.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +18.1 More โ†’ 0.890 (#65) AdjNet +18.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 69.0 | AdjD 59.7 More โ†’ 0.700 (#72) AdjO 69.0 | AdjD 59.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.6 | AdjD 62.7 More โ†’ 0.566 (#110) AdjO 65.6 | AdjD 62.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.692 (#84) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.667 (#87) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 159 | GP 28 More โ†’ 1040 (#128) RD 159 | GP 28

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-11 vs Tennessee Lady Volunteers L 54 - 71
2012-11-13 vs Kennesaw State Owls W 80 - 51
2012-11-18 vs Marquette Golden Eagles W 76 - 72
2012-11-28 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 73 - 83
2012-12-02 vs Georgia Lady Bulldogs L 50 - 60
2012-12-06 @ Duke Blue Devils L 52 - 85
2012-12-16 vs Alcorn State Lady Braves W 76 - 49
2012-12-21 vs Washington Huskies W 52 - 44
2012-12-29 vs Quinnipiac Bobcats W 74 - 57
2012-12-30 @ Florida International Panthers L 62 - 63
2013-01-03 vs Florida State Seminoles L 78 - 85
2013-01-06 @ Clemson Tigers W 81 - 59
2013-01-10 vs Virginia Cavaliers L 51 - 62
2013-01-13 @ North Carolina Tar Heels L 58 - 79
2013-01-17 @ Miami Hurricanes L 65 - 71
2013-01-20 vs Maryland Terrapins L 57 - 66
2013-01-25 @ Florida State Seminoles L 71 - 76
2013-01-27 vs NC State Wolfpack L 66 - 78
2013-01-31 vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons W 89 - 82
2013-02-03 @ Virginia Cavaliers W 65 - 62
2013-02-08 vs Virginia Tech Hokies L 61 - 63
2013-02-10 vs North Carolina Tar Heels L 58 - 60
2013-02-17 @ NC State Wolfpack W 79 - 70
2013-02-21 @ Wake Forest Demon Deacons W 82 - 64
2013-02-24 vs Miami Hurricanes W 68 - 64
2013-02-28 vs Clemson Tigers W 74 - 48
2013-03-03 @ Boston College Eagles L 68 - 74
2013-03-07 vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons L 67 - 86

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

Not enough player minute data to plot.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Marshall T. Marshall G 6 0.0 16.2 8.0 3.0 2.3 0.3 3.7 16.3 9.8 69 19 3.6 5.3 42.9 0.0 50.0 5.98 44.3 42.9
D. Hamilton-Carter D. Hamilton-Carter NA 5 0.0 8.2 5.0 0.4 1.4 0.6 2.4 7.0 6.2 27 19 1.4 2.4 51.4 0 50.0 2.15 52.0 51.4
D. Maye D. Maye G 5 0.0 7.0 5.0 5.8 2.4 0.4 3.2 13.0 4.4 -3 19 -0.2 -0.2 23.1 12.5 75.0 -0.95 26.2 24.6
S. Wallace S. Wallace G 4 0.0 6.8 0.8 1.5 0.2 0.0 2.0 9.5 -2.2 9 19 0.5 0.9 26.3 31.2 33.3 -0.29 33.2 32.9
A. Whiteside A. Whiteside G 7 0.0 5.9 2.0 0.7 1.1 0.0 1.7 4.9 3.1 18 18 1.0 2.1 44.1 37.5 71.4 1.81 55.3 52.9
R. Rogers R. Rogers F 3 0.0 3.7 5.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 3.3 2.7 4.7 0 17 0.0 0.0 62.5 0 50.0 -0.8 61.9 62.5
J. Blain J. Blain NA 3 0.0 2.7 4.3 0.7 0.7 0.3 1.3 6.7 0.7 0 12 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 100.0 0.31 19.2 15.0
B. McDonald B. McDonald G 2 0.0 2.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.5 -49 14 -3.5 -22.5 33.3 0.0 0 -4.15 33.3 33.3
N. Taylor N. Taylor C 4 0.0 1.0 1.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.5 11 18 0.6 2.2 11.1 0 50.0 0.95 18.6 11.1
S. Bivins S. Bivins C 1 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 -8 12 -0.7 -3.1 0.0 0 0 0.42 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG