Fort Lauderdale
Also known as: Fort Lauderdale
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 865 (#475) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 719 (#524) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 877 (#633) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -48.0 (#305) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -42.7 (#682) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.000 (#703) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.001 (#477) | NetEff -47.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.002 (#727) | AdjNet -53.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.002 (#723) | AdjNet -51.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.041 (#725) | AdjO 45.1 | AdjD 79.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.089 (#695) | AdjO 55.8 | AdjD 81.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.034 (#692) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.041 (#693) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 669 (#519) | RD 228 | GP 5 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-17 | @ | Rollins | L | 38 - 74 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Ga. Southwestern | L | 49 - 95 |
| 2025-12-19 | vs | Lincoln (PA) | L | 57 - 77 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Elizabeth City St. | L | 58 - 101 |
| 2025-12-29 | @ | Valdosta St. | L | 55 - 107 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexis Gibbs | - | 3 | 35.6 | 14.3 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 6.3 | 16.3 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 22.4 | 19.2 | 72.7 | - | 36.6 | 27.6 |
| Amelia Gatson | - | 3 | 32.1 | 11.3 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 11.0 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 33.3 | 47.4 | - | 41.1 | 37.9 |
| Takayla Davis | - | 1 | 36.8 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 72 | 3.6 | 14.9 | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.7 | 49.1 | 33.3 |
| Alicia Loesch | - | 2 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 7.5 | 9.5 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 45.4 | 26.7 |
| Maiya Petit | - | 2 | 21.9 | 8.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 43.5 | 40.6 |
| Keara Parker | - | 3 | 33.4 | 8.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 6.0 | 9.7 | -2.0 | -57 | -3.2 | -11.3 | 27.6 | 14.3 | 61.5 | 0.97 | 36.0 | 29.3 |
| Khyle Wharton | - | 3 | 27.3 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 8.3 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 43.0 | 44.0 |
| Kouraje Johnson | - | 1 | 40.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 14.0 | -7.0 | - | - | - | 21.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 23.5 | 21.4 |
| Arlinda Roundtree | - | 3 | 27.0 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 9.3 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 31.9 | 28.6 |
| Nina Solomon | - | 2 | 24.8 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 51.1 | 44.4 |
| Jadah Kingcade | - | 2 | 20.8 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 42.5 | 40.0 |
| Esther Joseph | - | 1 | 17.6 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Kintaeja Ling | - | 2 | 26.7 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 20.0 | 75.0 | - | 29.1 | 20.8 |
| Monique Taylor | - | 3 | 18.5 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 36.3 | 33.3 |
| Samiya Morris | - | 1 | 21.6 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | -28 | -1.2 | -9.8 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0 | 1.78 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Alyssa Johnson | - | 2 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 94 | 4.3 | 22.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Yadira Marshall | - | 1 | 17.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| UNKNOWN TEAM | - | 1 | 18.1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 10.4 | 0.0 |
| Reshea Pilgrim | - | 1 | 38.6 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| Tyra Varisse | - | 3 | 7.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Kindal Glanton | - | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Clinnesha Simmons | - | 1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG