Embry-Riddle (FL)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1051 (#101) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1052 (#161) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 970 (#434) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +12.6 (#70) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +4.2 (#257) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.717 (#200) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.964 (#151) | NetEff +30.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.873 (#171) | AdjNet +16.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.875 (#169) | AdjNet +16.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.776 (#146) | AdjO 88.5 | AdjD 74.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.584 (#167) | AdjO 83.4 | AdjD 79.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.610 (#225) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.596 (#234) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1001 (#224) | RD 93 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Morehouse | W | 73 - 67 |
| 2025-11-16 | @ | Trevecca Nazarene | L | 82 - 88 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Flagler | L | 77 - 81 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Saint Leo | W | 104 - 80 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | Valdosta St. | L | 91 - 103 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Trinity Baptist | W | 102 - 73 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 81 - 96 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Barry | W | 77 - 70 |
| 2025-12-19 | vs | Fort Lauderdale | W | 104 - 79 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Newberry | L | 89 - 94 |
| 2025-12-31 | @ | Florida Tech | W | 95 - 62 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Eckerd | W | 99 - 73 |
| 2026-01-07 | vs | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 66 - 70 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Lynn | W | 101 - 79 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Fla. Southern | L | 83 - 89 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Tampa | L | 87 - 107 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Rollins | L | 88 - 96 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Eckerd | W | 80 - 74 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Florida Tech | W | 91 - 89 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Barry | L | 80 - 81 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Tampa | L | 93 - 104 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Berry | - | 21 | 31.9 | 19.9 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 15.3 | 12.1 | 86 | 4.3 | 22.8 | 44.4 | 37.4 | 90.5 | -0.64 | 56.8 | 50.2 |
| Dawson Barr | - | 20 | 28.2 | 14.5 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 17 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 47.7 | 45.7 | 73.3 | -1.97 | 62.2 | 60.9 |
| Jack Klinger | - | 21 | 29.3 | 12.3 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 6.9 | 12.6 | 69 | 3.5 | 21.1 | 71.5 | 0 | 68.8 | -0.43 | 72.8 | 71.5 |
| Evan Montanari | - | 19 | 22.7 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 33 | 1.7 | 24.2 | 36.1 | 35.6 | 82.4 | -2.24 | 51.4 | 49.4 |
| Braeden Moore | - | 21 | 20.2 | 7.6 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 6.9 | 4.7 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 37.2 | 39.3 | 100.0 | -1.63 | 53.7 | 52.4 |
| Chalier Torres | - | 11 | 13.6 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 16 | 1.5 | 10.4 | 42.4 | 40.7 | 87.5 | 3.21 | 58.9 | 51.7 |
| Logan Lewis | - | 20 | 18.8 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 85 | 4.2 | 31.5 | 49.5 | 28.6 | 76.7 | 2.68 | 58.9 | 53.5 |
| Clarens Pierre | - | 20 | 21.7 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 9.6 | 31 | 1.6 | 10.7 | 59.5 | 16.7 | 62.0 | 1.0 | 62.5 | 60.1 |
| Landen Harwood | - | 21 | 13.5 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 52 | 2.6 | 38.0 | 46.2 | 27.8 | 78.6 | 2.51 | 54.7 | 49.4 |
| Relja Vranesevic | - | 10 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 70.0 | 0 | 83.3 | 0.98 | 75.2 | 70.0 |
| Milan Skoric | - | 6 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | -0.2 | 2 | 0.4 | 18.1 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 0 | 0.84 | 46.9 | 46.9 |
| Theo Stangas | - | 7 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Ryan Mueller | - | 5 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 27.6 | 20.0 |
| Walker Jackson | - | 6 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 24.2 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.06 | 25.5 | 20.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG