Edinboro
Season:
2026
Also known as: Edinboro
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1065 (#211) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1023 (#277) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +5.7 (#265) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.837 (#278) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.820 (#259) | AdjNet +13.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.819 (#261) | AdjNet +12.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.676 (#255) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 59.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.589 (#245) | AdjO 63.9 | AdjD 59.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.642 (#263) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.621 (#278) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1083 (#205) | RD 314 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Haddad | - | 1 | 35.1 | 18.0 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 19.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 45.3 | 44.7 |
| Rachael Manfredo | - | 1 | 26.5 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 15.0 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 69.0 | 63.6 |
| Taylor Blunt | - | 1 | 33.8 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 37.3 | 34.6 |
| Hope Garrity | - | 1 | 38.6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 25.3 | 18.2 |
| Carmen Vasquez | - | 1 | 10.3 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 77.3 | 66.7 |
| Kendal Batchik | - | 1 | 11.3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 33.8 | 25.0 |
| Kassie Potts | - | 1 | 21.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 26.0 | 0.0 |
| Bailie Brinson | - | 1 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Carla Brown | - | 1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 | 126 | 7.4 | 32.2 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.35 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Jess Hetz | - | 1 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG