🐻⬇️🏀

Eastern Washington

Also known as: Eastern Washington Eagles
Program History

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1163 (#242) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1248 (#190) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 944 (#499) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +20.4 (#221) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +0.5 (#305) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.184 (#106) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -28.0 More → 0.038 (#115) AdjNet -28.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -28.5 More → 0.036 (#115) AdjNet -28.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 70.7 More → 0.440 (#454) AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 70.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.444 (#324) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.434 (#324) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 148 | GP 31 More → 854 (#499) RD 148 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Crosgile J. Crosgile G 12 36.0 14.7 5.9 5.5 1.7 0.0 3.4 0.2 24.1 -91 -7.6 -9.6 66.7 50.0 50.0 -0.48 1560.3 83.3
V. Jois V. Jois F 28 32.7 12.3 9.0 2.0 0.9 2.4 2.5 1.4 22.7 -90 -3.2 -4.6 55.0 0 62.5 -0.22 396.4 55.0
C. Chiverton C. Chiverton F 24 17.2 10.8 2.0 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.5 11.2 -52 -2.2 -4.6 41.7 45.5 87.5 -0.04 326.4 55.6
P. Kelly P. Kelly G 30 28.1 9.5 2.6 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.6 11.9 -94 -3.1 -4.6 38.9 38.5 66.7 -0.74 735.0 52.8
M. Seiferth M. Seiferth F 31 22.9 8.2 6.3 0.3 0.4 2.2 1.2 0.7 15.4 -102 -3.3 -6.8 72.7 0 46.2 -0.83 458.2 72.7
T. Harvey T. Harvey G 20 14.8 7.5 2.4 1.6 0.8 0.1 1.1 0.1 11.2 -2 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 0 0 0.38 7450.0 0.0
J. Forbes J. Forbes G 26 28.2 6.7 2.7 2.2 0.8 0.1 1.2 1.3 10.0 -71 -2.5 -4.2 44.1 47.6 75.0 -0.13 244.7 58.8
K. Winford K. Winford G 24 21.4 6.3 2.0 2.5 0.7 0.0 1.5 1.2 8.9 -24 -1.0 -1.9 51.7 47.1 60.0 0.22 243.6 65.5
T. Reuter T. Reuter F 31 22.2 5.4 3.1 1.5 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.6 8.5 -46 -1.5 -2.6 30.0 25.0 44.4 -0.12 346.4 32.5
D. Powell D. Powell - 5 6.4 4.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.6 5.0 -11 -2.2 -11.9 0.0 0.0 0 1.71 333.3 0.0
J. Hickert J. Hickert F 29 10.1 3.0 2.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.3 4.9 -94 -3.1 -8.8 50.0 66.7 0 -0.62 550.0 75.0
I. Dorsey I. Dorsey - 16 7.8 2.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.3 1.9 -39 -2.4 -9.6 0.0 0.0 0 -0.4 350.0 0.0
D. Hill D. Hill G 22 11.9 1.8 1.3 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.3 3.8 15 0.5 0.8 16.7 0 0 0.53 325.0 16.7
F. Jorg F. Jorg C 16 2.6 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 -28 -1.9 -15.2 0 0 0 -0.42 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG