🐻⬇️🏀

Eastern New Mexico

Season: 2024 2019 2017 2013 2012 2010 2005 2004
Also known as: Eastern New Mexico Greyhounds
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

57.0
PPG
77.5
Opp
-18.0
Margin
41.8%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
83.3%
FT%
30.0
RPG
9.0
APG
7.0
TO
64.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 799 (#1056) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 833 (#1047) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 994 (#352) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +7.2 (#454) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -1.3 (#332) HCA +3.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 66.0 More → 0.473 (#342) AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 66.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.460 (#309) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.459 (#306) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 2 More → 890 (#427) RD 350 | GP 2

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-12-14 @ Cal Poly Mustangs L 57 - 60
2012-12-18 @ BYU Cougars L 62 - 95

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
R. Blackmon R. Blackmon G 2 33.0 18.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 9.0 12.5 -34 -3.1 -3.9 50.0 42.9 100.0 0.03 97.6 58.3
R. Love R. Love G 2 31.5 7.5 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 5.5 7.0 -51 -4.6 -6.5 36.4 33.3 100.0 -0.23 63.1 45.5
D. Hardwell D. Hardwell F 2 19.0 7.5 3.5 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.5 11.0 -15 -1.4 -2.2 66.7 0 100.0 0.15 193.3 66.7
G. McFarland G. McFarland C 1 19.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 -3.0 1 0.1 0.3 14.3 0 0 0.35 14.3 14.3
K. Lantz K. Lantz G 2 21.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 1.5 -55 -6.9 -13.2 33.3 0.0 0 -0.79 33.3 33.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG