East Texas A&M
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1032 (#180) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1055 (#181) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1017 (#262) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +31.7 (#31) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.999 (#44) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.999 (#43) | NetEff +46.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.996 (#44) | AdjNet +47.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.997 (#47) | AdjNet +47.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.933 (#52) | AdjO 79.0 | AdjD 50.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.649 (#122) | AdjO 66.3 | AdjD 59.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.915 (#26) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.887 (#31) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-09 | vs | Texas-Dallas | W | 81 - 42 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Horvath | - | 1 | 29.5 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 71.2 | 60.0 |
| Cora Horvath | - | 1 | 29.8 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 60.0 | 100.0 | - | 79.9 | 68.8 |
| Tiani Ellison | - | 1 | 18.6 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Reza Po | - | 1 | 29.2 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 70.0 | - | 44.4 | 25.0 |
| Ahmya Boyce | - | 1 | 31.1 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 17.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 58.3 | - | 36.6 | 14.3 |
| Nyaluak Dak | - | 1 | 12.1 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 69.4 | 66.7 |
| Sarah Gatwech | - | 1 | 20.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 23.5 | 0.0 |
| Terrayah McCoy | - | 1 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 41.0 | 50.0 |
| Trinity Moreland | - | 1 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Alva Hedrich | - | 1 | 14.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG