Drexel
Season:
2026
Also known as: Drexel
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More β | 1030 (#183) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More β | 1048 (#199) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More β | 1013 (#291) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More β | +42.9 (#13) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More β | 1.000 (#8) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More β | 0.998 (#25) | AdjNet +53.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More β | 0.999 (#27) | AdjNet +52.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More β | 0.962 (#27) | AdjO 83.3 | AdjD 47.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More β | 0.842 (#14) | AdjO 76.2 | AdjD 57.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More β | 0.942 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More β | 0.925 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More β | 1085 (#148) | RD 300 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | vs | Chestnut Hill | W | 95 - 38 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amaris Baker | - | 1 | 24.9 | 26.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 18.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 67.3 | 63.9 |
| Iriona Gravley | - | 1 | 22.9 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 21.0 | - | - | - | 90.9 | 0 | 42.9 | - | 81.7 | 90.9 |
| Deja Evans | - | 1 | 14.8 | 13.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 85.7 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 87.4 | 85.7 |
| Laine McGurk | - | 1 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 59.5 | 50.0 |
| JΓΊlia Garcia Roig | - | 1 | 24.5 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 71.7 | 75.0 |
| Bria Watkins | - | 1 | 13.1 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 61.5 | 50.0 |
| Grace O'Neill | - | 1 | 24.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Molly Rullo | - | 1 | 27.5 | 4.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 22.5 | 12.5 |
| Mariah Watkins | - | 1 | 19.1 | 3.0 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 61.5 | 50.0 |
| Emilee Jones | - | 1 | 9.6 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG