🐻⬇️🏀

Drexel

Season: 2026 2023 2022 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Drexel
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1032 (#243) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1033 (#310) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +56 elo More → 997 (#478) HCA +56 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.0 More → +11.4 (#216) HCA +3.0
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.995 (#148) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +30.7 More → 0.972 (#106) AdjNet +30.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +30.2 More → 0.973 (#109) AdjNet +30.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 85.7 | AdjD 62.4 More → 0.892 (#106) AdjO 85.7 | AdjD 62.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 76.7 | AdjD 72.9 More → 0.586 (#235) AdjO 76.7 | AdjD 72.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.741 (#156) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.704 (#195) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs Widener W 93 - 59

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Josh Reed - 1 25.3 17.0 12.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 24.0 - - - 63.6 0.0 42.9 - 60.4 63.6
Garfield Turner - 1 11.2 14.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 7.0 14.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Dillon Tingler - 1 20.0 10.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 8.0 - - - 30.0 37.5 50.0 - 46.0 45.0
Ralph Akuta - 1 15.7 9.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 13.0 - - - 80.0 0 50.0 - 76.5 80.0
Shane Blakeney - 1 21.0 9.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 3.0 - - - 40.0 50.0 0 - 45.0 45.0
Kevon Vanderhorst - 1 24.4 9.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 19.0 - - - 75.0 66.7 50.0 - 92.2 100.0
Eli Beard - 1 21.2 6.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 10.0 -1.0 - - - 20.0 14.3 50.0 - 27.6 25.0
Martin de Laporterie - 1 13.1 6.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 9.0 - - - 75.0 0 0 - 75.0 75.0
Victor Panov - 1 20.4 6.0 9.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 17.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 100.0 - 51.0 40.0
Max Davis - 1 6.9 5.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 42 2.1 25.6 66.7 50.0 0 2.57 83.3 83.3
Horace Simmons - 1 20.8 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 -3.0 - - - 11.1 0.0 0 - 11.1 11.1

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG