DePauw
Season:
2026
Also known as: DePauw Tigers
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1205 (#49) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1204 (#51) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1122 (#65) | HCA +56 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +6.0 (#46) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +3.9 (#290) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.577 (#146) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.541 (#94) | AdjNet +1.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.535 (#93) | AdjNet +1.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.519 (#98) | AdjO 75.7 | AdjD 74.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.647 (#154) | AdjO 75.7 | AdjD 69.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.681 (#228) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.684 (#216) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1213 (#58) | RD 94 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2026-02-04 | @ | Wittenberg | W | 61 - 56 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Oberlin | W | 75 - 66 |
| 2026-02-11 | @ | Denison | W | 83 - 79 |
| 2026-02-18 | vs | Ohio Wesleyan | W | 77 - 76 |
| 2026-02-21 | @ | Wooster | W | 67 - 55 |
| 2026-02-27 | vs | John Carroll | L | 71 - 82 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Jacobs | - | 6 | 33.2 | 14.5 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 12.2 | 7.8 | - | - | - | - | 43.8 | 37.5 | 68.8 | - | 54.3 | 52.1 |
| Caleb Washington | - | 6 | 31.8 | 14.3 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 11.0 | 9.5 | - | - | - | - | 43.9 | 25.0 | 88.9 | - | 55.2 | 47.0 |
| Reph Stevenson | - | 6 | 25.6 | 10.7 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 7.8 | 10.5 | - | - | - | - | 46.8 | 0 | 76.9 | - | 54.8 | 46.8 |
| Joe Smith | - | 5 | 24.0 | 10.6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.6 | 7.6 | - | - | - | - | 42.1 | 46.4 | 80.0 | - | 62.5 | 59.2 |
| Brady Kunka | - | 6 | 31.2 | 9.7 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 9.8 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 35.3 | 71.4 | - | 60.2 | 57.1 |
| Logan Sigler | - | 4 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 60.0 | 60.0 |
| Billy Bach | - | 6 | 14.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | 46.2 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 61.2 | 57.7 |
| Eli Ellis | - | 6 | 10.1 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.3 | - | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 40.0 | - | 53.3 | 55.0 |
| Andre Ozlowski | - | 6 | 7.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | - | - | - | - | 38.5 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| Vince Nixon | - | 6 | 7.9 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 23.1 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 28.8 | 23.1 |
| Patrick Joyce | - | 6 | 14.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 16.7 | 0 | - | 29.2 | 29.2 |
| Owen Goddard | - | 4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Divine Adeyanju | - | 3 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 25.8 | 33.3 |
| James Jones | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Kamon Washington | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Nixon | - | 3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Whitman Charboneau | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Danny Shackleton | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Connor O'Guinn | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG