πŸ»β¬‡οΈπŸ€

Cornell Big Red

Also known as: Cornell Big Red
Program History

2022 Team Stats (3 games)

73.3
PPG
74.3
Opp
+5.2
Margin
47.1%
FG%
33.9%
3P%
71.7%
FT%
33.0
RPG
11.0
APG
12.7
TO
77.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2021-2022
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More β†’ 1127 (#191) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More β†’ 1228 (#135) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More β†’ 1007 (#177) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More β†’ +25.6 (#141) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More β†’ +9.9 (#209) HCA +2.4
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More β†’ 0.467 (#65) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -5.3 More β†’ 0.363 (#165) NetEff -5.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -13.3 More β†’ 0.178 (#100) AdjNet -13.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -13.4 More β†’ 0.176 (#100) AdjNet -13.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 72.9 | AdjD 71.1 More β†’ 0.541 (#192) AdjO 72.9 | AdjD 71.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More β†’ 0.707 (#191) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More β†’ 0.670 (#190) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 143 | GP 23 More β†’ 1007 (#213) RD 143 | GP 23

2022 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2021-11-09 @ Binghamton Bearcats W 76 - 69
2021-11-12 @ Lafayette Leopards W 90 - 85
2021-11-16 vs Colgate Raiders W 78 - 68
2021-11-19 vs Wells College Express W 107 - 48
2021-11-22 @ Penn State Nittany Lions L 74 - 85
2021-11-29 @ Canisius Golden Griffins W 89 - 75
2021-12-03 vs Coppin State Eagles W 92 - 77
2021-12-05 vs Keuka W 122 - 64
2021-12-08 @ Virginia Tech Hokies L 60 - 93
2022-01-02 vs Dartmouth Big Green W 79 - 71
2022-01-07 @ Pennsylvania Quakers L 65 - 79
2022-01-15 @ Yale Bulldogs L 69 - 96
2022-01-22 vs Harvard Crimson W 76 - 61
2022-01-30 @ Brown Bears W 74 - 72
2022-02-04 vs Princeton Tigers W 88 - 83
2022-02-05 vs Pennsylvania Quakers L 68 - 73
2022-02-09 vs Columbia Lions W 88 - 75
2022-02-12 vs Brown Bears L 80 - 81
2022-02-18 @ Dartmouth Big Green L 59 - 71
2022-02-19 @ Harvard Crimson L 72 - 77
2022-02-26 vs Yale Bulldogs W 71 - 65
2022-03-05 @ Columbia Lions W 78 - 64
2022-03-12 @ Princeton Tigers L 73 - 77

2022 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Patel S. Patel - 3 22.3 11.7 3.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 8.3 8.0 4 0.2 0.3 52.0 50.0 66.7 -0.02 66.5 66.0
D. Noll D. Noll - 5 25.6 11.6 3.6 2.2 1.8 0.0 2.4 6.0 10.8 - - - 50.0 37.5 55.6 0.58 85.4 55.0
Chris MaΓ±on Chris MaΓ±on G 23 18.1 10.4 3.9 1.8 1.8 0.3 2.2 2.3 13.7 - - - 58.5 62.5 44.4 - 209.8 63.2
J. Jones J. Jones F 5 20.2 8.8 3.6 1.6 1.2 0.2 1.2 4.2 10.0 80 2.4 3.6 23.8 16.7 100.0 0.3 98.6 28.6
K. Boothby K. Boothby F 23 22.4 7.3 3.5 0.7 1.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 10.9 27 1.0 1.9 48.3 40.9 83.3 0.13 267.1 63.8
K. Dickson K. Dickson - 5 16.6 6.4 4.0 1.8 0.0 0.8 2.0 2.8 8.2 -5 -0.2 -0.4 64.3 0.0 63.6 -0.06 84.9 64.3
G. Dolan G. Dolan - 3 18.3 6.3 2.0 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.7 2.0 7.7 - - - 50.0 100.0 66.7 -0.27 129.8 58.3
Nazir Williams Nazir Williams - 22 15.9 6.1 1.8 1.5 0.7 0.0 1.5 1.4 7.3 28 1.1 2.7 50.0 14.3 87.5 0.02 201.4 51.7
K. Catchings K. Catchings - 1 18.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 9.0 67 2.8 5.0 0 0 0 0.64 0 0
S. Hansen S. Hansen F 23 13.2 5.8 2.8 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.9 1.2 8.8 38 1.5 4.5 53.6 33.3 80.0 -0.05 206.8 58.9
Guy Ragland Jr. Guy Ragland Jr. - 21 9.1 5.4 2.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.8 7.8 49 2.0 8.3 29.4 11.1 71.4 0.65 281.4 32.4
D. Ervin D. Ervin - 6 8.2 4.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.3 - - - 0 0 0 0.45 0 0
I. Gray I. Gray G 19 9.7 2.7 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.5 4.4 49 2.2 8.5 50.0 0.0 75.0 0.81 221.1 50.0
Williams, Evan Williams, Evan F 6 6.8 2.0 1.8 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.3 3.7 - - - 50.0 0 100.0 - 208.3 50.0
M. Filien M. Filien - 18 11.7 1.9 2.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 4.9 - - - 42.9 0.0 0 0.15 242.9 42.9
Chris Cain Chris Cain - 5 4.6 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.8 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
M. Samberg M. Samberg G 5 6.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 38 1.5 7.2 0 0 0 0.16 0 0
S. Freedman S. Freedman G 1 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0.2 0.8 0 0 0 0.36 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG