Converse University Valkyries
Also known as: Converse Valkyries
Program History
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 992 (#425) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -20.4 (#792) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -19.9 (#570) | HCA +2.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.400 (#572) | AdjO 65.4 | AdjD 69.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.153 (#580) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.184 (#588) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 825 (#593) | RD 350 | GP 2 |
2022 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | @ | Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs | L | 46 - 79 |
| 2021-12-18 | @ | South Carolina Upstate Spartans | L | 38 - 78 |
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Lorange
|
- | 2 | 28.0 | 10.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.01 | 0 | 0 |
J. Mitchell
|
- | 2 | 25.0 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 |
E. Pitts
|
- | 2 | 21.0 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.57 | 0 | 0 |
J. Warlick
|
- | 2 | 24.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.64 | 0 | 0 |
J. Sanders Iii
|
- | 2 | 27.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -69 | -3.5 | -6.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.34 | 0 | 0 |
E. Burgess Iii
|
- | 2 | 25.0 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | -91 | -4.0 | -13.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 |
W. Morgan
|
- | 2 | 18.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.51 | 0 | 0 |
J. Alexander
|
- | 2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | -71 | -2.4 | -6.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.18 | 0 | 0 |
T. Green
|
- | 2 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 74 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 |
L. Harrington
|
- | 2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Gordon
|
- | 2 | 9.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
W. Searl
|
- | 1 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG