Connecticut Sun
Model Outputs
2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2002 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 881 (#12) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 825 (#14) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 910 (#16) | HCA +51 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -7.3 (#15) | HCA +1.6 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.7 (#15) | HCA +1.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.228 (#15) | - |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.391 (#16) | AdjO 82.4 | AdjD 87.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.350 (#16) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.354 (#16) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 854 (#17) | RD 92 | GP 28 |
2002 Schedule & Results
No games found for this season.
2002 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nykesha Sales | F | 31 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 11.9 | 11.1 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 30.6 | 77.8 | - | 52.4 | 49.3 |
| Taj McWilliams-Franklin | F | 31 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 10.3 | 15.2 | - | - | - | 47.8 | 20.0 | 74.8 | - | 53.2 | 48.1 |
| Shannon Johnson | G | 25 | 0.0 | 12.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 36.9 | 36.5 | 75.7 | - | 51.6 | 44.7 |
| Elaine Powell | G | 31 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 39.7 | 38.8 | 75.2 | - | 51.8 | 46.3 |
| Katie Douglas | - | 21 | 0.0 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 6.9 | - | - | - | 37.3 | 32.7 | 75.6 | - | 49.1 | 43.7 |
| Jessie Hicks | F | 31 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 5.1 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 39.2 | 0 | 65.6 | - | 44.6 | 39.2 |
| Brooke Wyckoff | F | 31 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 31.9 | 16.7 | 69.2 | - | 38.3 | 34.5 |
| Tiffany McCain | G | 31 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 30.3 | 30.0 | 66.7 | - | 40.8 | 39.4 |
| Cintia dos Santos | - | 9 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 0 | 83.3 | - | 43.9 | 36.8 |
| Towana Alhaleem | G | 25 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 32.8 | 36.4 | 50.0 | - | 38.2 | 36.2 |
| Jaclyn Johnson | C | 16 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 50.0 | 80.0 | - | 64.0 | 61.4 |
| Carla McGhee | - | 17 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 27.2 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG