🐻⬇️🏀

Connecticut Sun

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Connecticut Sun
Program History

Model Outputs

2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2001 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 881 (#12) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 825 (#14) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +51 elo More → 910 (#16) HCA +51 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.6 More → -7.3 (#15) HCA +1.6
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.8 More → -3.7 (#15) HCA +1.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.228 (#15) -
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 82.4 | AdjD 87.2 More → 0.391 (#16) AdjO 82.4 | AdjD 87.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.350 (#16) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.354 (#16) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 92 | GP 28 More → 854 (#17) RD 92 | GP 28

2001 Schedule & Results

No games found for this season.

2001 Roster

Minutes by Position

Not enough player minute data to plot.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Adrienne Johnson G 24 0.0 13.6 3.0 1.8 0.8 0.1 0.0 12.2 7.0 - - - 44.0 34.2 87.5 - 53.1 50.9
Taj McWilliams-Franklin F 24 0.0 13.0 7.5 1.8 1.6 1.1 0.0 10.5 14.5 - - - 50.8 41.7 67.5 - 54.7 51.8
Nykesha Sales F 24 0.0 11.5 3.5 2.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 11.3 7.5 - - - 41.3 32.9 69.4 - 48.3 46.5
Shannon Johnson G 24 0.0 10.0 4.9 4.8 1.5 0.2 0.0 8.4 13.0 - - - 38.1 35.1 73.3 - 49.7 43.1
Cintia dos Santos F 24 0.0 6.9 3.5 1.0 0.6 1.9 0.0 7.1 6.9 - - - 42.4 0.0 66.7 - 45.0 42.4
Carla McGhee - 23 0.0 3.0 2.4 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.0 3.0 4.1 - - - 33.8 0.0 70.6 - 42.2 33.8
Elaine Powell G 12 0.0 3.0 2.3 2.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 3.5 4.8 - - - 31.0 25.0 72.7 - 38.4 33.3
Cornelia Gayden - 1 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Jessie Hicks F 17 0.0 1.8 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.1 2.2 - - - 44.4 0 60.0 - 53.4 44.4
LaCharlotte Smith - 3 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.3 - - - 66.7 0.0 100.0 - 72.7 66.7
Tiffany McCain - 21 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.3 - - - 27.0 25.0 100.0 - 37.8 32.4
Jannon Roland - 14 0.0 1.2 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.2 - - - 36.8 20.0 33.3 - 39.3 39.5
Romana Hamzova - 10 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.4 - - - 22.2 0.0 25.0 - 23.2 22.2

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG