Colorado Buffaloes
Model Outputs
2018-2019
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1424 (#62) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1459 (#47) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.3 (#52) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.550 (#28) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.578 (#57) | AdjNet +2.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.580 (#57) | AdjNet +2.8 |
2019 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-25 | @ | Charlotte 49ers | W | 68 - 53 |
| 2019-03-13 | vs | California Golden Bears | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2019-03-14 | @ | Oregon State Beavers | W | 73 - 58 |
| 2019-03-15 | @ | Washington Huskies | L | 61 - 66 |
| 2019-03-19 | vs | Dayton Flyers | W | 78 - 73 |
| 2019-03-27 | @ | Texas Longhorns | L | 55 - 68 |
2019 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Bey
|
- | 3 | 29.3 | 13.3 | 10.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 21.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 151.5 | 45.5 |
D. Schwartz
|
- | 3 | 31.7 | 13.0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 12.7 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 62.5 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 73.1 |
M. Wright IV
|
- | 3 | 35.0 | 10.7 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 12.3 | 16 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 1.14 | 98.8 | 50.0 |
N. Wright
|
G | 1 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 58.7 | 40.0 |
D. Kountz
|
- | 3 | 25.3 | 9.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 229.6 | 40.0 |
S. Gatling
|
G | 6 | 24.3 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.7 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 26.5 | 27.3 | 90.0 | - | 44.3 | 35.3 |
E. Battey
|
- | 3 | 19.3 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 127.6 | 60.0 |
L. Siewert
|
F | 6 | 22.3 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 31.2 | 50.0 | - | 43.0 | 39.1 |
A. Strating
|
F | 4 | 9.5 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 74.3 | 66.7 |
E. Parquet
|
- | 2 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG