Colo. Sch. of Mines
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1137 (#65) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1047 (#202) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 949 (#558) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +5.8 (#114) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +5.2 (#283) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.547 (#340) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.612 (#241) | NetEff +3.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.804 (#273) | AdjNet +12.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.821 (#268) | AdjNet +12.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.681 (#268) | AdjO 72.6 | AdjD 64.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.559 (#230) | AdjO 68.5 | AdjD 65.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.543 (#318) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.537 (#320) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 923 (#337) | RD 96 | GP 25 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | vs | UT Tyler | L | 50 - 55 |
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Neb.-Kearney | L | 70 - 72 |
| 2025-11-09 | @ | Mont. St. Billings | L | 50 - 61 |
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Texas Woman's | L | 55 - 80 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Texas-Dallas | W | 67 - 56 |
| 2025-11-21 | @ | Minnesota St. | L | 66 - 94 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Rogers St. | W | 79 - 73 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Adams St. | L | 68 - 75 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | N.M. Highlands | W | 68 - 62 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Westminster (UT) | W | 78 - 62 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Colorado Mesa | L | 47 - 86 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Hawaii Pacific | W | 56 - 53 |
| 2026-01-02 | vs | Nelson | W | 98 - 42 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Northern N.M. | W | 100 - 49 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | South Dakota Mines | W | 78 - 76 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | CSU Pueblo | W | 73 - 70 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Colo. Christian | W | 77 - 68 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Regis (CO) | W | 76 - 60 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | MSU Denver | L | 59 - 72 |
| 2026-01-29 | @ | Fort Lewis | L | 83 - 86 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Adams St. | L | 70 - 80 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Western Colo. | L | 64 - 73 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Westminster (UT) | L | 69 - 73 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofia Baldessari | - | 19 | 28.3 | 20.7 | 7.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 15.6 | 13.8 | 14 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 44.9 | 31.7 | 84.8 | -1.01 | 57.4 | 51.4 |
| Jenna Shandy | - | 23 | 30.0 | 12.1 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 11.3 | 6.8 | 16 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 38.7 | 36.7 | 76.7 | 0.58 | 49.8 | 47.1 |
| Emma Sixta | - | 19 | 25.5 | 11.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 8.1 | 9.0 | 51 | 2.4 | 8.5 | 50.0 | 40.8 | 83.3 | -0.22 | 62.7 | 59.4 |
| Jade Leon | - | 23 | 31.2 | 7.7 | 5.6 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 7.0 | 8.6 | -22 | -0.9 | -2.4 | 37.9 | 24.0 | 80.0 | -1.17 | 48.1 | 41.6 |
| Sophia Baal | - | 23 | 14.8 | 6.0 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 8 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 41.5 | 11.1 | 54.5 | 1.19 | 44.4 | 41.9 |
| Quincey Baum | - | 23 | 21.9 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 5.7 | 47 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 36.0 | 10.3 | 67.9 | 3.85 | 41.8 | 37.5 |
| Olivia Campbell | - | 19 | 14.1 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | -30 | -1.5 | -9.0 | 44.3 | 52.6 | 66.7 | -0.59 | 55.1 | 52.5 |
| Lindsey Jones | - | 23 | 14.6 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 4.0 | 2.5 | -6 | -0.2 | -1.3 | 34.1 | 31.0 | 100.0 | -2.1 | 47.2 | 44.0 |
| Emily Thomas | - | 23 | 22.1 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 24 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 37.0 | 34.8 | 60.0 | -0.33 | 45.6 | 42.0 |
| Madison Gage | - | 18 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | -13 | -0.7 | -15.8 | 39.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 0.62 | 50.3 | 48.8 |
| Isa Hensley | - | 5 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | -3 | -0.8 | -5.0 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.74 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
| Liv Loveland | - | 10 | 7.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.0 | -4 | -0.4 | -2.6 | 18.8 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.56 | 18.8 | 18.8 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG