🐻⬇️🏀

Col. of Charleston

Also known as: Col. of Charleston
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1051 (#166) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More → 1006 (#244) HCA +95 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +13.9 (#112) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.967 (#94) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +26.0 More → 0.953 (#75) AdjNet +26.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +25.9 More → 0.954 (#74) AdjNet +25.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 87.8 | AdjD 67.4 More → 0.865 (#69) AdjO 87.8 | AdjD 67.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 75.2 | AdjD 72.3 More → 0.566 (#184) AdjO 75.2 | AdjD 72.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.760 (#95) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.729 (#108) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 1088 (#128) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs Tusculum W 79 - 58

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Chris Davis Jr - 1 22.9 14.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 5.0 - - - 46.7 0.0 0.0 - 44.1 46.7
Chol Machot - 1 19.7 14.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 16.0 - - - 66.7 0 50.0 - 65.1 66.7
Christian Reeves - 1 19.1 12.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 14.0 - - - 71.4 0 50.0 - 68.5 71.4
Kendall Taylor - 1 29.5 12.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 0 0.0 0.0 45.5 0.0 100.0 1.91 50.5 45.5
Martin Kalu - 1 21.8 11.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 8.0 11.0 - - - 50.0 25.0 100.0 - 61.9 56.2
Jlynn Counter - 1 23.4 10.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.0 10.0 - - - 27.3 0.0 100.0 - 39.2 27.3
Jaxon Prunty - 1 20.6 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 75.0 - 26.0 0.0
Chadlyn Traylor - 1 20.8 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 -2.0 - - - 16.7 0.0 25.0 - 19.3 16.7
Djordje Curcic - 1 18.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 -3.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
AJ Fowler - 1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 0.7 2.8 0 0 0 0.33 0 0
Joey Scarpitti - 1 2.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG