Clinton
Also known as: Clinton
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 980 (#319) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 916 (#412) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 982 (#488) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -41.9 (#679) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.002 (#674) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.005 (#463) | NetEff -36.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.017 (#677) | AdjNet -34.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.015 (#682) | AdjNet -34.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.090 (#691) | AdjO 47.0 | AdjD 72.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.347 (#581) | AdjO 61.4 | AdjD 68.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.081 (#663) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.112 (#653) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 915 (#359) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-27 | vs | Shaw | L | 62 - 77 |
| 2023-11-29 | @ | Saint Augustine's | L | 40 - 110 |
| 2024-01-18 | @ | Francis Marion | L | 50 - 83 |
| 2024-02-17 | vs | Virginia Union | L | 0 - 0 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaelin Davis | - | 2 | 28.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.17 | 43.9 | 41.2 |
| Caleah Smith | - | 1 | 37.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 14.0 | -6.0 | 43 | 3.9 | 7.2 | 21.4 | 18.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 26.9 | 28.6 |
| Jasmine Jenkins | - | 2 | 17.0 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.07 | 40.2 | 37.5 |
| Maiya Petit | - | 2 | 25.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0.0 | 57.1 | -0.38 | 49.7 | 45.5 |
| Jazmyne Lyde | - | 1 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 51.8 | 60.0 |
| Jakyiiah Willis | - | 2 | 31.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 8.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 17.6 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 25.2 | 23.5 |
| Amira Roy | - | 2 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 8.5 | -1.5 | -3 | -0.5 | -1.4 | 23.5 | 0 | 0 | -0.19 | 23.5 | 23.5 |
| Jamila Jenkins | - | 2 | 30.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | -4.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.4 | 14.3 | 0 | 0.23 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Alajiah Kirk-Veal | - | 1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Jaclyn Wright-Thompson | - | 2 | 24.5 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | -61 | -5.5 | -29.1 | 12.5 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.56 | 11.8 | 12.5 |
| Hanan Richmond | - | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kiara Hortman | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG