Cincinnati
2021 Team Stats (3 games)
63.3
PPG
75.2
Opp
-16.0
Margin
40.6%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
62.5%
FT%
38.0
RPG
14.7
APG
17.3
TO
80.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1289 (#91) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1335 (#88) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.4 (#45) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.060 (#98) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.173 (#93) | AdjNet -13.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.167 (#93) | AdjNet -13.8 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-12 | @ | Tennessee Volunteers | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2021-02-21 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 52 - 90 |
| 2021-03-12 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2021-03-13 | @ | Wichita State Shockers | W | 60 - 59 |
| 2021-03-14 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 54 - 91 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Davenport
|
- | 5 | 23.2 | 12.6 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 7.4 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 42.9 | 72.7 | - | 59.6 | 57.3 |
K. Williams
|
G | 5 | 20.6 | 8.6 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 4.6 | 22 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 26.7 | 23.5 | 55.6 | 0.25 | 37.8 | 31.1 |
T. Eason
|
- | 5 | 18.2 | 8.4 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 8.6 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 34.9 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 40.5 | 37.2 |
M. Adams-Woods
|
- | 5 | 22.6 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 31.0 | 30.8 | 84.6 | - | 47.5 | 37.9 |
D. DeJulius
|
- | 5 | 18.8 | 6.4 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 7.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 21.4 | 83.3 | - | 38.4 | 34.6 |
M. Diarra
|
F | 2 | 13.5 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 61.5 | 62.5 |
M. Saunders Jr.
|
- | 5 | 17.6 | 5.6 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 3.8 | 32 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 42.3 | 16.7 | 71.4 | 0.43 | 48.1 | 44.2 |
Mason Madsen
|
- | 4 | 14.0 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 23.1 | 60.0 | - | 47.4 | 45.2 |
C. Vogt
|
C | 5 | 11.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 61.8 | 66.7 |
R. Elvin
|
- | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 300.0 | 150.0 |
R. Ivanauskas
|
F | 1 | 23.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 20.5 | 0.0 |
Z. Harvey
|
G | 1 | 21.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
S. Martin
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Broodo
|
- | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Banks
|
- | 2 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
A. Cook
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG