Chattanooga
Also known as: Chattanooga
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1036 (#157) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1068 (#143) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1016 (#275) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +37.7 (#17) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 1.000 (#40) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 1.000 (#21) | NetEff +68.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.996 (#50) | AdjNet +46.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.997 (#45) | AdjNet +46.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.927 (#59) | AdjO 76.3 | AdjD 48.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.879 (#8) | AdjO 78.9 | AdjD 57.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.948 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.936 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1078 (#171) | RD 263 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-03 | vs | King (TN) | W | 82 - 34 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Southern Wesleyan | W | 97 - 46 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caia Elisaldez | - | 2 | 24.9 | 15.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 12.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 70.8 | 71.4 |
| Izzy McPherson | - | 2 | 18.2 | 13.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 72.0 | 67.6 |
| Kalifa Ford | - | 2 | 15.0 | 13.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 15.0 | -3 | -0.3 | -5.9 | 77.8 | 100.0 | 90.0 | -0.84 | 97.0 | 94.4 |
| Ava Card | - | 2 | 20.4 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 53.3 | 62.5 | 50.0 | - | 69.3 | 70.0 |
| Evie Bruce | - | 2 | 16.7 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 13.0 | -26 | -1.4 | -6.7 | 70.0 | 0.0 | 80.0 | -2.08 | 73.8 | 70.0 |
| London Weaver | - | 2 | 18.4 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | - | 63.0 | 66.7 |
| Gianna Corbitt | - | 2 | 19.9 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 45.0 | 41.7 |
| Sarah Owona | - | 2 | 22.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 53.0 | 45.0 |
| Kami Wilson | - | 2 | 13.6 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.5 | -0.5 | -14 | -0.8 | -7.7 | 30.8 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.32 | 32.4 | 30.8 |
| Frode Flos van der Schans | - | 2 | 14.6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
| Falon Bedke | - | 2 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG