🐻⬇️🏀

Charleston

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History
Coach: Earl Grant

2019 Team Stats (4 games)

64.5
PPG
70.5
Opp
-6.0
Margin
40.9%
FG%
30.5%
3P%
71.4%
FT%
30.0
RPG
11.5
APG
10.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
70.3
Adj PPG
67.1
Adj Opp PPG
#126
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2018-2019
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Historical Elo fit predates the season cutoff fix and has no verified season-bounded input receipt. More → Data withheld: source-integrity hold Historical Elo fit predates the season cutoff fix and has no verified season-bounded input receipt.
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1150 (#69) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +83 elo More → 1072 (#65) HCA +83 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +3.2 (#130) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More → +1.0 (#154) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.702 (#57) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +4.6 More → 0.628 (#124) AdjNet +4.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +4.5 More → 0.628 (#127) AdjNet +4.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 67.1 More → 0.573 (#126) AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 67.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 71.0 | AdjD 68.3 More → 0.560 (#102) AdjO 71.0 | AdjD 68.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.602 (#120) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.599 (#110) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 147 | GP 32 More → 1099 (#96) RD 147 | GP 32

2019 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2018-11-06 vs Presbyterian Blue Hose W 85 - 73
2018-11-10 @ Western Carolina Catamounts W 77 - 74
2018-11-13 vs Rhode Island Rams W 66 - 55
2018-11-18 @ Oklahoma State Cowboys L 58 - 70
2018-11-22 @ LSU Tigers L 55 - 67
2018-11-23 @ UAB Blazers W 74 - 51
2018-11-25 vs Memphis Tigers W 78 - 75
2018-11-28 vs South Carolina State Bulldogs W 83 - 70
2018-12-01 vs Charlotte 49ers W 72 - 64
2018-12-09 vs Georgia College Bobcats W 87 - 69
2018-12-15 @ VCU Rams W 83 - 79
2018-12-18 @ Siena Saints W 83 - 58
2018-12-21 vs Coastal Carolina Chanticleers W 73 - 71
2018-12-29 @ UNC Wilmington Seahawks W 73 - 66
2019-01-03 @ Towson Tigers W 67 - 55
2019-01-05 @ James Madison Dukes L 58 - 69
2019-01-10 vs Drexel Dragons L 78 - 79
2019-01-12 vs Delaware Blue Hens W 71 - 58
2019-01-17 @ Northeastern Huskies L 60 - 69
2019-01-19 @ Hofstra Pride L 72 - 86
2019-01-24 vs Elon Phoenix W 72 - 53
2019-01-26 vs William & Mary Tribe W 74 - 59
2019-01-31 vs James Madison Dukes W 70 - 53
2019-02-02 vs Towson Tigers W 54 - 53
2019-02-07 @ Delaware Blue Hens W 83 - 75
2019-02-09 @ Drexel Dragons W 86 - 84
2019-02-14 vs Hofstra Pride L 95 - 99
2019-02-16 vs Northeastern Huskies W 88 - 79
2019-02-21 @ William & Mary Tribe L 84 - 86
2019-02-23 @ Elon Phoenix W 84 - 74
2019-03-02 vs UNC Wilmington Seahawks W 70 - 61
2019-03-10 vs Drexel Dragons W 73 - 61
2019-03-11 @ Northeastern Huskies L 67 - 70

2019 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
G. Riller G. Riller G 30 35.4 22.2 3.5 4.0 1.2 0.1 2.4 4.0 24.6 200 29 6.9 8.2 46.7 18.2 84.0 3.7 234.5 49.2
Jarrell Brantley Jarrell Brantley - 30 34.0 19.4 8.3 2.6 1.5 0.8 2.6 4.1 25.9 184 29 6.3 7.7 52.8 36.7 86.2 1.25 214.7 57.3
B. Galloway B. Galloway - 30 25.5 7.9 2.4 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 2.0 9.9 150 29 5.2 8.5 37.3 33.3 42.9 0.59 190.9 49.2
Z. Jasper Z. Jasper - 30 25.1 5.2 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.8 1.3 7.1 103 29 3.6 5.8 28.9 29.2 71.4 -1.72 177.8 38.2
M. Pointer M. Pointer G 22 24.5 4.9 2.0 2.3 0.7 0.1 1.5 0.5 8.1 42 21 2.0 3.4 20.0 33.3 80.0 -3.23 442.6 25.0
J. McManus J. McManus F 30 19.0 4.7 3.8 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.7 1.1 7.3 49 29 1.7 3.5 41.2 28.6 50.0 -1.05 197.1 47.1
S. Miller S. Miller F 21 12.8 4.6 2.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.5 6.7 0 19 0.0 0.0 54.5 50.0 100.0 -3.11 376.2 59.1
J. Richard J. Richard G 29 13.1 4.0 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.0 0.8 4.7 45 26 1.7 5.4 31.8 8.3 77.8 -0.46 221.5 34.1
N. Harris N. Harris F 29 17.7 3.2 3.6 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 6.8 119 27 4.4 10.0 50.0 0 57.1 0.91 243.7 50.0
I. Moore I. Moore - 2 6.0 2.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 25 9 2.8 11.3 50.0 0.0 50.0 -0.27 53.9 50.0
S. Ndiaye S. Ndiaye C 3 3.0 2.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 2.7 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
O. Smart O. Smart C 11 5.5 0.3 1.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.5 7 10 0.7 6.2 0.0 0 0 -0.74 150.0 0.0
J. Blackmon Jr. J. Blackmon Jr. - 2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
T. Robinson T. Robinson - 1 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG