๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Charleston

Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History

2016 Team Stats (1 games)

63.0
PPG
85.0
Opp
-22.0
Margin
39.3%
FG%
30.8%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
32.0
RPG
12.0
APG
17.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
62.8
Adj PPG
59.8
Adj Opp PPG
#123
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2015-2016
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 973 (#187) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1052 (#136) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +98 elo More โ†’ 975 (#207) HCA +98 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ +3.2 (#122) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ +2.4 (#134) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.604 (#114) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +4.6 More โ†’ 0.630 (#122) AdjNet +4.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +4.6 More โ†’ 0.630 (#122) AdjNet +4.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 62.8 | AdjD 59.8 More โ†’ 0.568 (#123) AdjO 62.8 | AdjD 59.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.6 | AdjD 60.4 More โ†’ 0.526 (#143) AdjO 61.6 | AdjD 60.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.543 (#148) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.535 (#153) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 148 | GP 30 More โ†’ 1008 (#161) RD 148 | GP 30

2016 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2015-11-13 vs South Carolina State Bulldogs W 74 - 54
2015-11-16 @ Navy Midshipmen W 72 - 58
2015-11-21 @ Davidson Wildcats L 81 - 82
2015-11-24 vs Coastal Carolina Chanticleers L 61 - 67
2015-11-27 vs Western Carolina Catamounts W 57 - 56
2015-11-30 vs LSU Tigers W 70 - 58
2015-12-05 @ The Citadel Bulldogs W 82 - 74
2015-12-07 vs East Carolina Pirates W 77 - 73
2015-12-13 vs North Greenville Trailblazers W 89 - 52
2015-12-19 @ Miami Hurricanes L 63 - 85
2015-12-22 @ Campbell Fighting Camels W 86 - 68
2015-12-31 @ James Madison Dukes W 65 - 62
2016-01-02 @ William & Mary Tribe L 70 - 78
2016-01-07 vs Hofstra Pride W 72 - 61
2016-01-09 @ Drexel Dragons L 54 - 61
2016-01-14 vs William & Mary Tribe L 61 - 63
2016-01-16 vs Elon Phoenix L 64 - 65
2016-01-21 @ Towson Tigers W 40 - 37
2016-01-23 vs Delaware Blue Hens W 59 - 58
2016-01-28 vs Northeastern Huskies W 68 - 61
2016-01-30 @ UNC Wilmington Seahawks L 55 - 65
2016-02-04 vs Towson Tigers W 65 - 47
2016-02-06 vs Drexel Dragons W 60 - 38
2016-02-11 vs James Madison Dukes L 52 - 56
2016-02-13 @ Elon Phoenix W 66 - 62
2016-02-18 @ Delaware Blue Hens L 59 - 62
2016-02-20 vs UNC Wilmington Seahawks L 55 - 59
2016-02-25 @ Northeastern Huskies L 57 - 58
2016-02-27 @ Hofstra Pride L 63 - 72
2016-03-04 vs Delaware Blue Hens W 67 - 63
2016-03-05 @ UNC Wilmington Seahawks L 64 - 66

2016 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
C. Barry C. Barry G 12 31.5 19.1 3.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 2.2 3.2 19.8 84 9 9.3 13.6 36.8 33.3 70.0 1.78 270.0 42.1
M. Pointer M. Pointer G 27 29.9 11.8 2.5 2.9 1.3 0.0 2.2 1.2 15.1 21 25 0.8 1.2 37.5 41.2 60.0 -1.38 466.4 48.4
Jarrell Brantley Jarrell Brantley - 27 28.9 11.7 7.4 1.3 1.4 0.5 2.4 0.9 19.0 -2 25 -0.1 -0.1 39.1 0.0 72.7 -2.56 565.7 39.1
C. Johnson C. Johnson G 27 32.8 11.6 3.2 2.3 1.1 0.5 2.1 1.1 15.4 56 25 2.2 2.9 35.5 33.3 75.0 1.1 476.2 40.3
J. Bourne J. Bourne F 1 15.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 70 16 4.4 13.3 75.0 0 66.7 4.08 75.2 75.0
E. Bailey E. Bailey F 27 21.1 6.2 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.5 7.7 32 25 1.3 2.4 23.1 25.0 0 -1.58 642.3 30.8
P. Hulsey P. Hulsey G 27 28.7 6.1 5.7 3.2 1.6 0.2 1.5 0.5 14.8 72 25 2.9 4.2 53.8 0 80.0 2.99 539.5 53.8
N. Harris N. Harris F 26 19.2 4.2 3.9 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.6 8.2 35 24 1.5 3.0 43.8 0 62.5 -0.05 281.8 43.8
T. O'Donohue T. O'Donohue F 17 16.6 3.1 3.5 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.3 6.2 41 16 2.6 7.0 40.0 0.0 0 0.55 530.0 40.0
D. Gilmore D. Gilmore F 23 7.5 1.4 1.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 2.7 -19 20 -0.9 -6.0 16.7 0 0 -3.34 275.0 16.7
H. Bowne H. Bowne F 4 3.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
T. Branin II T. Branin II - 2 2.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
J. Eck J. Eck - 2 3.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG