๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Charleston

Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History

2014 Team Stats (2 games)

60.0
PPG
63.0
Opp
-3.0
Margin
38.6%
FG%
24.3%
3P%
60.5%
FT%
35.5
RPG
10.5
APG
11.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
61.4
Adj PPG
62.3
Adj Opp PPG
#186
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2013-2014
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 889 (#251) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 924 (#236) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +92 elo More โ†’ 942 (#254) HCA +92 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ -1.1 (#186) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ -1.1 (#188) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.494 (#173) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -2.2 More โ†’ 0.438 (#189) AdjNet -2.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -2.2 More โ†’ 0.438 (#189) AdjNet -2.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 61.4 | AdjD 62.3 More โ†’ 0.478 (#186) AdjO 61.4 | AdjD 62.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.5 | AdjD 62.0 More โ†’ 0.490 (#188) AdjO 61.5 | AdjD 62.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.414 (#220) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.416 (#222) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 149 | GP 31 More โ†’ 876 (#258) RD 149 | GP 31

2014 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-11-09 @ Louisville Cardinals L 48 - 70
2013-11-12 vs Charlotte 49ers W 83 - 82
2013-11-15 vs UNC Asheville Bulldogs L 58 - 67
2013-11-18 vs Miami Hurricanes L 54 - 70
2013-11-23 vs Furman Paladins W 89 - 55
2013-11-28 @ San Diego State Aztecs L 52 - 72
2013-11-29 @ Arizona State Sun Devils L 58 - 80
2013-12-01 vs Cal State Fullerton Titans W 61 - 48
2013-12-12 vs Coker Cobras W 68 - 54
2013-12-15 vs Marist Red Foxes L 62 - 69
2013-12-18 @ Old Dominion Monarchs W 51 - 44
2013-12-21 vs Kent State Golden Flashes L 54 - 58
2013-12-29 @ The Citadel Bulldogs W 72 - 48
2014-01-01 @ Davidson Wildcats W 76 - 64
2014-01-04 vs Howard Bison W 60 - 50
2014-01-07 vs James Madison Dukes W 75 - 61
2014-01-11 @ Hofstra Pride L 71 - 75
2014-01-13 @ Northeastern Huskies W 58 - 49
2014-01-19 vs Towson Tigers L 57 - 72
2014-01-22 vs UNC Wilmington Seahawks W 75 - 70
2014-01-25 @ James Madison Dukes L 56 - 58
2014-01-27 @ William & Mary Tribe L 63 - 74
2014-02-01 vs Hofstra Pride W 67 - 49
2014-02-05 @ Delaware Blue Hens L 64 - 67
2014-02-08 @ Towson Tigers L 61 - 68
2014-02-13 vs Drexel Dragons W 47 - 46
2014-02-15 vs Northeastern Huskies L 44 - 60
2014-02-19 vs William & Mary Tribe W 87 - 54
2014-02-22 @ UNC Wilmington Seahawks L 55 - 57
2014-02-26 @ Drexel Dragons L 45 - 56
2014-03-01 vs Delaware Blue Hens L 86 - 89
2014-03-08 @ William & Mary Tribe L 59 - 70

2014 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
W. Hall W. Hall F 21 33.4 12.1 9.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 2.1 4.5 16.1 51 26 2.0 2.6 49.5 38.7 56.5 1.14 120.8 55.8
A. Stitt A. Stitt G 21 33.5 9.6 2.9 3.0 1.0 0.1 1.6 4.2 10.7 35 26 1.3 1.7 36.4 30.8 56.5 0.42 102.9 43.2
A. Baru A. Baru F 21 29.0 9.1 7.0 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.8 3.4 13.9 35 26 1.3 2.0 55.6 0 40.0 -0.24 109.3 55.6
C. Barry C. Barry G 16 22.6 8.2 2.3 1.6 0.4 0.2 1.9 4.7 6.2 46 19 2.4 4.2 34.7 24.2 75.9 3.0 75.2 40.0
N. Johnson N. Johnson G 16 22.6 7.7 2.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.6 2.3 8.8 56 19 2.9 5.2 35.1 33.3 83.3 2.28 155.1 48.6
A. Thomas A. Thomas F 21 24.4 7.2 4.5 1.1 0.7 0.6 1.6 2.3 10.2 -45 26 -1.7 -2.9 46.9 20.0 68.0 -3.96 125.8 48.0
J. Chealey J. Chealey G 18 20.9 6.3 2.2 1.9 0.7 0.2 1.1 2.8 7.4 9 21 0.4 0.9 35.3 35.3 67.7 -0.65 87.4 41.2
T. Johnson T. Johnson G 18 11.1 2.4 1.8 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 3.9 -31 25 -1.2 -5.3 50.0 40.0 71.4 -4.6 128.8 57.1
J. Burroughs-Cook J. Burroughs-Cook G 15 6.5 2.1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 2.1 -6 17 -0.4 -2.4 30.8 28.6 75.0 -1.63 93.8 38.5
D. Wishon D. Wishon C 1 11.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 -40 24 -1.7 -5.8 100.0 0 0.0 -3.39 69.4 100.0
T. O'Donohue T. O'Donohue F 10 4.5 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.4 1.2 -2 13 -0.2 -1.5 75.0 100.0 75.0 -0.65 104.2 87.5
P. Branin P. Branin G 5 1.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 9 6 1.5 39.6 0 0 0 0.27 0 0
H. Bowne H. Bowne F 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
J. Hall J. Hall F 2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
C. Cooke C. Cooke - 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
G. Pierre Jr. G. Pierre Jr. C 5 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG