Charleston
2013 Team Stats (1 games)
38.0
PPG
80.0
Opp
-42.0
Margin
34.8%
FG%
13.3%
3P%
40.0%
FT%
31.0
RPG
5.0
APG
27.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.1
Adj PPG
62.2
Adj Opp PPG
#151
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1051 (#142) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1091 (#109) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1072 (#80) | HCA +102 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +0.7 (#155) | HCA +3.1 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -0.0 (#170) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.673 (#84) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.542 (#147) | AdjNet +1.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.541 (#148) | AdjNet +1.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.522 (#151) | AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 62.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.550 (#118) | AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 62.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.550 (#141) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.555 (#139) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1049 (#132) | RD 122 | GP 34 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Lawrence
|
G | 33 | 32.6 | 13.5 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 17.7 | 140 | 22 | 6.4 | 8.5 | 36.5 | 28.1 | 63.0 | 2.92 | 349.1 | 45.2 |
A. Stitt
|
G | 34 | 32.9 | 11.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.7 | 117 | 22 | 5.3 | 7.1 | 38.8 | 42.4 | 76.5 | 0.47 | 251.1 | 49.3 |
A. Baru
|
F | 35 | 30.8 | 9.8 | 8.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 16.9 | 68 | 22 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 50.0 | 0 | 58.3 | -1.06 | 232.9 | 50.0 |
A. Thomas
|
F | 35 | 29.1 | 8.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 12.4 | 36 | 22 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 45.5 | 18.2 | 57.9 | -2.72 | 236.0 | 47.3 |
T. Wiedeman
|
F | 26 | 21.0 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 12.7 | 48 | 16 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 65.1 | 0 | 71.4 | 0.06 | 225.8 | 65.1 |
W. Hall
|
F | 34 | 24.3 | 7.7 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 13.6 | 151 | 21 | 7.2 | 12.3 | 35.3 | 25.0 | 91.7 | 4.05 | 333.5 | 38.2 |
N. Johnson
|
G | 35 | 17.2 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.9 | -22 | 22 | -1.0 | -2.8 | 41.7 | 41.7 | 60.0 | -4.46 | 205.5 | 55.6 |
T. Johnson
|
G | 33 | 10.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 28 | 20 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 47.8 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.06 | 171.5 | 58.7 |
M. Sundberg
|
F | 32 | 8.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 3.6 | -42 | 19 | -2.2 | -11.5 | 31.6 | 28.6 | 66.7 | -3.45 | 152.5 | 42.1 |
P. Branin
|
G | 13 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -18 | 9 | -2.0 | -34.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.86 | 109.0 | 33.3 |
T. Dixon
|
G | 19 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | -7 | 12 | -0.6 | -9.4 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | -2.65 | 150.0 | 83.3 |
B. Benton
|
G | 11 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -7 | 7 | -1.0 | -39.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.41 | 75.0 | 0.0 |
H. Bowne
|
F | 12 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | -19 | 8 | -2.4 | -51.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3.04 | 0 | 0 |
J. Hall
|
F | 9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | -8 | 7 | -1.1 | -42.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.58 | 0 | 0 |
C. Cooke
|
- | 8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | -0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG