๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Charleston

Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

38.0
PPG
80.0
Opp
-42.0
Margin
34.8%
FG%
13.3%
3P%
40.0%
FT%
31.0
RPG
5.0
APG
27.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.1
Adj PPG
62.2
Adj Opp PPG
#151
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1051 (#142) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1091 (#109) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +102 elo More โ†’ 1072 (#80) HCA +102 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.1 More โ†’ +0.7 (#155) HCA +3.1
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ -0.0 (#170) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.673 (#84) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +1.5 More โ†’ 0.542 (#147) AdjNet +1.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +1.4 More โ†’ 0.541 (#148) AdjNet +1.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 62.2 More โ†’ 0.522 (#151) AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 62.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 62.9 More โ†’ 0.550 (#118) AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 62.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.550 (#141) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.555 (#139) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 122 | GP 34 More โ†’ 1049 (#132) RD 122 | GP 34

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-09 vs Towson Tigers W 75 - 58
2012-11-15 vs St. John's Red Storm L 53 - 64
2012-11-16 @ Auburn Tigers L 51 - 55
2012-11-18 vs Boston College Eagles W 71 - 67
2012-11-24 @ Baylor Bears W 63 - 59
2012-11-28 @ Charleston Southern Buccaneers W 72 - 67
2012-12-01 @ Elon Phoenix W 56 - 54
2012-12-04 vs Louisville Cardinals L 38 - 80
2012-12-13 vs Anderson (SC) Trojans L 49 - 65
2012-12-18 vs Old Dominion Monarchs W 76 - 65
2012-12-22 vs Coastal Carolina Chanticleers W 60 - 51
2012-12-29 @ Vermont Catamounts W 62 - 50
2012-12-31 @ Marist Red Foxes W 85 - 75
2013-01-05 vs Furman Paladins W 60 - 56
2013-01-10 vs Samford Bulldogs L 57 - 62
2013-01-12 vs Chattanooga Mocs W 86 - 59
2013-01-14 @ The Citadel Bulldogs W 73 - 69
2013-01-17 @ Georgia Southern Eagles L 47 - 51
2013-01-19 @ Davidson Wildcats L 68 - 77
2013-01-24 vs The Citadel Bulldogs W 69 - 54
2013-01-26 @ Wofford Terriers W 79 - 50
2013-01-30 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers W 72 - 59
2013-02-02 vs UNC Greensboro Spartans W 81 - 59
2013-02-07 @ Samford Bulldogs W 69 - 65
2013-02-09 @ Chattanooga Mocs W 71 - 68
2013-02-14 vs Davidson Wildcats L 59 - 75
2013-02-16 vs Georgia Southern Eagles W 69 - 60
2013-02-20 @ Western Carolina Catamounts W 67 - 65
2013-02-23 vs Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs L 52 - 55
2013-02-28 vs Wofford Terriers W 55 - 50
2013-03-02 @ Furman Paladins W 74 - 50
2013-03-09 vs Western Carolina Catamounts W 78 - 70
2013-03-10 @ Elon Phoenix W 68 - 60
2013-03-11 @ Davidson Wildcats L 55 - 74
2013-03-19 vs George Mason Patriots L 77 - 78

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Lawrence A. Lawrence G 33 32.6 13.5 3.0 3.7 1.3 0.3 2.6 1.6 17.7 140 22 6.4 8.5 36.5 28.1 63.0 2.92 349.1 45.2
A. Stitt A. Stitt G 34 32.9 11.0 2.4 3.2 0.5 0.1 2.5 2.0 12.7 117 22 5.3 7.1 38.8 42.4 76.5 0.47 251.1 49.3
A. Baru A. Baru F 35 30.8 9.8 8.3 0.6 0.4 1.3 1.9 1.7 16.9 68 22 3.1 4.4 50.0 0 58.3 -1.06 232.9 50.0
A. Thomas A. Thomas F 35 29.1 8.5 4.8 1.5 0.7 0.6 2.2 1.6 12.4 36 22 1.6 2.5 45.5 18.2 57.9 -2.72 236.0 47.3
T. Wiedeman T. Wiedeman F 26 21.0 8.5 5.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.7 12.7 48 16 3.0 6.2 65.1 0 71.4 0.06 225.8 65.1
W. Hall W. Hall F 34 24.3 7.7 6.4 0.8 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.0 13.6 151 21 7.2 12.3 35.3 25.0 91.7 4.05 333.5 38.2
N. Johnson N. Johnson G 35 17.2 4.5 1.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 1.0 1.0 5.9 -22 22 -1.0 -2.8 41.7 41.7 60.0 -4.46 205.5 55.6
T. Johnson T. Johnson G 33 10.5 2.8 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.7 4.2 28 20 1.4 6.5 47.8 50.0 60.0 0.06 171.5 58.7
M. Sundberg M. Sundberg F 32 8.2 2.1 1.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 3.6 -42 19 -2.2 -11.5 31.6 28.6 66.7 -3.45 152.5 42.1
P. Branin P. Branin G 13 2.2 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 1.0 -18 9 -2.0 -34.9 33.3 0.0 0.0 -2.86 109.0 33.3
T. Dixon T. Dixon G 19 2.5 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.6 -7 12 -0.6 -9.4 66.7 50.0 0 -2.65 150.0 83.3
B. Benton B. Benton G 11 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 -7 7 -1.0 -39.3 0.0 0.0 0 -1.41 75.0 0.0
H. Bowne H. Bowne F 12 1.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 -19 8 -2.4 -51.4 0 0 0 -3.04 0 0
J. Hall J. Hall F 9 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 -8 7 -1.1 -42.2 0 0 0 -1.58 0 0
C. Cooke C. Cooke - 8 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 -0.5 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 100.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG