Central Baptist College Mustangs
Also known as: Central Baptist College Mustangs
Program History
2026 Team Stats (1 games)
24.0
PPG
97.0
Opp
-73.0
Margin
18.0%
FG%
8.3%
3P%
100.0%
FT%
32.0
RPG
6.0
APG
34.0
TO
85.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 997 (#257) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -29.9 (#538) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.399 (#456) | AdjO 60.9 | AdjD 65.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.088 (#537) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.120 (#538) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 936 (#274) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters | L | 24 - 97 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Steele
|
G | 1 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 44.4 | 35.7 |
A. Ballew
|
G | 1 | 27.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 22.2 | 22.2 |
L. Duck
|
G | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 28.6 | 28.6 |
R. Whittington
|
G | 1 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
A. Hudspeth
|
G | 1 | 30.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 10.1 | 0.0 |
R. Head
|
G | 1 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
J. Haden
|
G | 1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
A. Grotjohn
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Jade Steele
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Kristyn Galloway
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E. Welch
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Christie
|
G | 1 | 32.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Jenny Scott
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 42 | 1.8 | 5.3 | - | - | - | -0.24 | - | - |
Kate Wood
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Emma Kate McBride
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG