Catawba
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1250 (#32) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1251 (#31) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1129 (#49) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +18.5 (#21) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +13.4 (#116) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.677 (#87) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 1.000 (#3) | NetEff +99.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.823 (#94) | AdjNet +13.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.849 (#79) | AdjNet +14.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.744 (#75) | AdjO 83.6 | AdjD 71.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.698 (#73) | AdjO 80.4 | AdjD 71.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.792 (#71) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.780 (#74) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1221 (#38) | RD 96 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-11 | @ | George Mason | - | Incomplete score |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Lander | L | 68 - 69 |
| 2025-11-16 | vs | USC Aiken | W | 90 - 52 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Columbus St. | W | 97 - 72 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Clayton St. | W | 96 - 77 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 71 - 75 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | W | 77 - 65 |
| 2025-12-09 | vs | Chowan | W | 71 - 68 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Tusculum | L | 75 - 76 |
| 2025-12-17 | vs | Coker | W | 91 - 66 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 91 - 75 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Carson-Newman | W | 80 - 66 |
| 2026-01-05 | @ | Livingstone | W | 87 - 63 |
| 2026-01-07 | @ | Wingate | W | 81 - 69 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | UVA Wise | W | 72 - 66 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Anderson (SC) | L | 74 - 97 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Mars Hill | W | 67 - 65 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Newberry | W | 82 - 79 |
| 2026-01-23 | vs | Carson-Newman | W | 71 - 56 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Lenoir-Rhyne | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-30 | @ | Lincoln Memorial | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-04 | @ | Coker | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Tusculum | W | 93 - 76 |
| 2026-02-11 | vs | Wingate | W | 72 - 56 |
| 2026-02-14 | @ | Emory & Henry | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2026-02-18 | vs | Anderson (SC) | L | 81 - 92 |
| 2026-02-21 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 105 - 66 |
| 2026-02-25 | @ | Newberry | W | 76 - 61 |
| 2026-02-28 | @ | UVA Wise | W | 91 - 69 |
| 2026-03-05 | vs | UVA Wise | W | 86 - 66 |
| 2026-03-06 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | W | 96 - 89 |
| 2026-03-07 | @ | Anderson (SC) | L | 75 - 78 |
| 2026-03-14 | vs | Columbus St. | L | 75 - 78 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibra Athie | - | 29 | 23.2 | 12.3 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 9.9 | 10.0 | - | - | - | - | 48.3 | 33.3 | 76.5 | - | 54.2 | 49.3 |
| Justin Banks | - | 28 | 22.3 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 8.3 | 10.0 | - | - | - | - | 47.6 | 41.5 | 74.6 | - | 56.0 | 52.4 |
| Nick Walker | - | 23 | 20.7 | 9.5 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 6.6 | 9.3 | - | - | - | - | 51.0 | 50.0 | 78.8 | - | 58.5 | 51.3 |
| Carson Daniel | - | 7 | 31.6 | 9.4 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 13.4 | - | - | - | - | 59.5 | 42.1 | 73.7 | - | 72.8 | 70.3 |
| Jordan Simpson | - | 25 | 26.7 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | - | - | - | - | 41.7 | 29.6 | 86.2 | - | 53.8 | 47.9 |
| LeVionne Lindsey | - | 25 | 23.9 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 9.2 | - | - | - | - | 40.0 | 27.3 | 87.3 | - | 54.2 | 44.6 |
| Alexander Gray | - | 20 | 24.4 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.3 | 9.9 | - | - | - | - | 40.6 | 27.8 | 84.1 | - | 53.0 | 45.3 |
| Jartavious Jackson | - | 20 | 24.4 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.3 | 9.9 | - | - | - | - | 40.6 | 27.8 | 84.1 | - | 53.0 | 45.3 |
| Shawn Long | - | 22 | 22.8 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 9.2 | - | - | - | - | 40.5 | 28.9 | 85.4 | - | 53.7 | 45.5 |
| Dermot Lowry | - | 21 | 23.3 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 5.1 | 9.6 | - | - | - | - | 41.1 | 27.8 | 84.1 | - | 53.4 | 45.8 |
| Malachi McCutcheon | - | 21 | 23.4 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 9.6 | - | - | - | - | 40.6 | 27.8 | 84.8 | - | 53.5 | 45.3 |
| Zion McDuffie | - | 29 | 11.9 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 5.5 | - | - | - | - | 55.8 | 22.2 | 55.9 | - | 57.9 | 56.6 |
| Jacob Bryant | - | 23 | 21.7 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 8.4 | - | - | - | - | 38.4 | 25.6 | 84.1 | - | 50.6 | 42.9 |
| Jashaun Hawkins | - | 26 | 9.6 | 5.7 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 35.6 | 36.6 | 62.9 | - | 49.2 | 46.7 |
| Solomon Tucker | - | 22 | 12.3 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 5.9 | - | - | - | - | 54.7 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 61.5 | 54.7 |
| Chase Daniel | - | 23 | 12.3 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 4.9 | - | - | - | - | 44.6 | 28.1 | 83.3 | - | 56.2 | 51.5 |
| Jalen Hilliard | - | 16 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | - | - | - | - | 52.6 | 0.0 | 60.0 | - | 54.2 | 52.6 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG