Campbell Fighting Camels
2025 Team Stats (8 games)
68.3
PPG
58.9
Opp
+9.3
Margin
40.6%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
63.0%
FT%
40.5
RPG
15.0
APG
11.1
TO
80.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1051 (#121) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +11.6 (#177) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.577 (#148) | AdjO 58.4 | AdjD 54.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.752 (#165) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.728 (#158) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1122 (#123) | RD 132 | GP 28 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-03 | @ | UNC Wilmington Seahawks | L | 61 - 67 |
| 2025-01-31 | vs | Monmouth Hawks | W | 76 - 67 |
| 2025-02-07 | vs | Northeastern Huskies | W | 81 - 41 |
| 2025-02-21 | vs | Drexel Dragons | L | 54 - 60 |
| 2025-02-28 | @ | Towson Tigers | W | 58 - 57 |
| 2025-03-14 | vs | Towson Tigers | W | 73 - 54 |
| 2025-03-15 | @ | Charleston Cougars | W | 80 - 59 |
| 2025-03-16 | vs | William & Mary Tribe | L | 63 - 66 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Dahlquist
|
F | 8 | 23.2 | 12.6 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 10.0 | 7.6 | 63 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 43.8 | 44.2 | 80.0 | 1.05 | 59.8 | 58.1 |
C. Alexander
|
G | 8 | 16.4 | 10.1 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 7.9 | -58 | -1.7 | -3.4 | 40.0 | 33.3 | 60.4 | -0.17 | 48.6 | 40.8 |
G. Boone
|
G | 8 | 25.0 | 9.6 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 3.9 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 42.5 | 20.0 | 57.1 | 0.16 | 44.7 | 43.1 |
G. Nuñez
|
G | 8 | 35.1 | 9.2 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 9.4 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 25.0 | 62.5 | - | 45.1 | 42.7 |
J. Felton
|
G | 7 | 27.3 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 12.9 | 26 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 46.3 | 33.3 | 70.0 | 0.85 | 54.8 | 52.8 |
H. Dill
|
G | 8 | 22.1 | 6.8 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 5.1 | 4.4 | -34 | -1.0 | -1.5 | 48.8 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.43 | 65.9 | 65.9 |
O. Tucker
|
G | 8 | 22.8 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 8.8 | 0.9 | -8 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 25.7 | 16.7 | 71.4 | 0.49 | 32.2 | 30.0 |
A. Fuller
|
G | 8 | 24.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 77 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 40.7 | 41.2 | 60.0 | 0.64 | 54.8 | 53.7 |
E. Thompson
|
G | 4 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | -20 | -1.2 | -15.1 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | -0.94 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
J. Woods
|
G | 8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | -9 | -0.3 | -1.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.04 | 34.0 | 30.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG