🐻⬇️🏀

California Baptist Lancers

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
Also known as: California Baptist Lancers
Program History

2025 Team Stats (2 games)

59.0
PPG
83.0
Opp
-24.0
Margin
34.7%
FG%
23.4%
3P%
64.1%
FT%
38.0
RPG
12.0
APG
15.0
TO
82.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 1139 (#32) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +14.1 (#149) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 69.9 | AdjD 65.9 More → 0.591 (#136) AdjO 69.9 | AdjD 65.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.834 (#111) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.807 (#110) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 111 | GP 30 More → 1231 (#54) RD 111 | GP 30

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-12-03 @ USC Trojans L 52 - 94
2025-03-13 @ UT Arlington Mavericks L 66 - 72

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
G. Schmidt G. Schmidt F 2 32.0 17.5 8.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 12.5 13.0 -19 -0.7 -0.9 48.0 50.0 62.5 0.61 54.6 50.0
C. Fiel C. Fiel G 1 34.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 -21 -0.8 -1.0 37.5 0.0 80.0 0.56 49.0 37.5
K. Lemon K. Lemon G 1 30.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 14.0 4.0 5 0.3 0.4 21.4 28.6 100.0 0.56 33.6 28.6
A. Tu'ua A. Tu'ua G 2 32.5 9.0 5.0 3.5 0.5 0.5 4.5 9.0 5.0 -22 -0.8 -0.9 44.4 16.7 16.7 0.73 43.6 47.2
E. Johansson E. Johansson F 2 26.0 7.0 4.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 8.0 4.0 -4 -0.2 -0.7 37.5 22.2 0 0.04 43.8 43.8
N. Bosch Duran N. Bosch Duran G 2 26.0 6.5 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 8.5 3.5 -46 -1.6 -1.9 29.4 30.0 0 0.33 38.2 38.2
N. Anderson N. Anderson G 1 23.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 -13 -0.8 -1.6 50.0 33.3 0 -0.02 62.5 62.5
C. Legaspi C. Legaspi G 2 20.5 4.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 2.0 4.0 3.5 26 1.1 1.5 12.5 0.0 100.0 1.04 37.6 12.5
H. Long H. Long PF 1 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0 -0.68 75.0 75.0
S. Nordstrom S. Nordstrom G 1 12.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 -20 -1.1 -1.6 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.01 26.6 0.0
S. White S. White G 2 10.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.0 -1.5 -7 -0.2 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0.85 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG