🐻⬇️🏀

Cal St. Monterey Bay

Also known as: Cal St. Monterey Bay
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1013 (#251) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 994 (#290) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 935 (#575) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +4.9 (#124) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → -7.3 (#476) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.119 (#525) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +58.3 More → 1.000 (#30) NetEff +58.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +48.0 More → 0.999 (#50) NetEff +48.0
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +54.7 More → 0.999 (#57) NetEff +54.7
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -6.8 More → 0.280 (#338) NetEff -6.8
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -111.3 More → 0.000 (#526) NetEff -111.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -9.5 More → 0.250 (#492) AdjNet -9.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -9.3 More → 0.249 (#495) AdjNet -9.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 59.0 | AdjD 65.4 More → 0.360 (#497) AdjO 59.0 | AdjD 65.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 58.2 | AdjD 62.7 More → 0.399 (#530) AdjO 58.2 | AdjD 62.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.346 (#489) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.354 (#485) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 131 | GP 7 More → 871 (#413) RD 131 | GP 7

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-01-22 @ San Fran. St. L 51 - 62
2026-01-24 @ Cal St. East Bay L 67 - 70
2026-01-29 vs UC Merced W 73 - 62
2026-01-31 vs Stanislaus St. W 82 - 49
2026-02-05 vs CSUSB W 50 - 48
2026-02-07 vs Cal Poly Pomona L 64 - 72

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Jennifer Moreno Ortiz - 6 32.5 13.3 4.3 2.0 2.2 0.2 2.3 11.8 7.8 -36 -1.8 -6.5 38.0 31.2 94.1 -2.37 51.0 45.1
Leah Sarabia - 6 26.5 10.0 5.8 2.5 1.2 0.7 3.0 8.8 8.3 -46 -2.7 -10.0 45.3 18.2 66.7 -1.56 50.3 47.2
A'ajah Slocum - 6 36.0 9.8 5.3 2.5 2.0 0.3 2.0 10.0 8.0 9 0.5 1.4 43.3 16.7 45.5 2.14 45.5 45.0
Cheyanne Whitfield - 4 23.0 9.0 5.0 0.8 1.5 0.2 1.5 7.2 7.8 -14 -1.4 -5.3 37.9 20.0 92.9 2.14 51.2 39.7
Riley Walls - 3 26.6 8.3 6.3 2.0 2.3 0.3 2.3 9.7 7.3 -3 -0.2 -0.9 31.0 28.6 41.7 -1.15 36.5 34.5
Jayden McNeal - 2 16.5 8.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 6.5 3.5 9 0.8 8.8 46.2 0 80.0 1.64 52.6 46.2
Malaysia Lucero - 6 18.5 6.2 3.7 0.2 0.8 0.2 1.3 5.8 3.8 10 0.5 2.8 48.6 0.0 50.0 0.46 49.1 48.6
Janelle Pena - 6 16.3 4.3 3.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 3.5 3.5 -72 -3.6 -29.5 42.9 0.0 57.1 -2.28 47.9 42.9
Brianna Bouton - 4 19.8 3.5 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 4.5 1.0 -29 -1.8 -17.6 33.3 20.0 0 1.11 38.9 38.9
Aliyah Young - 6 10.1 3.0 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.7 -17 -0.8 -7.6 33.3 27.3 100.0 0.88 46.6 41.7
Ledjan Pahukoa - 6 9.0 2.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.7 0.5 -25 -1.5 -19.5 25.0 27.3 50.0 2.55 35.5 34.4
Demi Thompson Lopez - 4 3.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 -22 -1.3 -24.4 66.7 0 0.0 0.04 51.5 66.7
Jolie Johnson - 3 1.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 -32 -3.2 -182.9 0 0 0 0.58 0 0
Sasha Capers - 2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -9 -0.8 -13.3 0 0 0 3.31 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG