🐻⬇️🏀

Cleveland Rockers

Season: 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
Also known as: Cleveland Rockers
Program History

2000 Team Stats (26 games)

66.1
PPG
64.3
Opp
+1.8
Margin
43.4%
FG%
33.2%
3P%
76.3%
FT%
28.5
RPG
15.7
APG
-
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.8
Adj PPG
63.5
Adj Opp PPG
#6
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2000
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 962 (#7) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 996 (#8) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +110 elo More → 997 (#7) HCA +110 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.7 More → +1.3 (#6) HCA +3.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +4.5 More → +2.1 (#6) HCA +4.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.599 (#6) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +2.4 More → 0.568 (#6) AdjNet +2.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +2.4 More → 0.570 (#6) AdjNet +2.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 63.5 More → 0.530 (#6) AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 63.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.7 | AdjD 61.7 More → 0.545 (#5) AdjO 63.7 | AdjD 61.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.522 (#7) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.525 (#7) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 72 | GP 38 More → 982 (#7) RD 72 | GP 38

2000 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2000-05-31 @ Minnesota Lynx L 62 - 73
2000-06-03 vs Washington Mystics W 72 - 49
2000-06-05 @ Charlotte W 69 - 53
2000-06-07 vs Connecticut Sun W 83 - 79
2000-06-10 vs Seattle Storm W 61 - 49
2000-06-12 @ Indiana Fever W 83 - 70
2000-06-16 vs Dallas Wings - Incomplete score
2000-06-17 @ Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-06-19 vs Sacramento Monarchs W 81 - 70
2000-06-22 @ Connecticut Sun L 64 - 77
2000-06-24 vs Minnesota Lynx L 57 - 60
2000-06-25 vs Phoenix Mercury W 64 - 51
2000-06-28 @ Portland Fire L 69 - 80
2000-07-01 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 67 - 75
2000-07-03 vs New York Liberty W 66 - 65
2000-07-07 @ Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-07-08 @ Charlotte W 80 - 59
2000-07-10 vs Charlotte W 72 - 65
2000-07-12 vs Connecticut Sun W 14 - 1
2000-07-15 vs Indiana Fever W 79 - 55
2000-07-20 vs Houston Comets L 56 - 74
2000-07-22 vs Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-07-24 @ Phoenix Mercury L 57 - 67
2000-07-26 @ Las Vegas Aces L 77 - 84
2000-07-28 vs Dallas Wings - Incomplete score
2000-07-29 @ New York Liberty L 67 - 81
2000-07-31 @ Dallas Wings - Incomplete score
2000-08-03 vs Las Vegas Aces W 74 - 71
2000-08-04 @ Indiana Fever L 75 - 87
2000-08-06 vs Washington Mystics W 77 - 60
2000-08-08 @ New York Liberty L 44 - 57
2000-08-09 @ Washington Mystics L 48 - 60
2000-08-11 @ Connecticut Sun L 55 - 62
2000-08-13 vs Connecticut Sun - Incomplete score
2000-08-15 vs Connecticut Sun W 72 - 43
2000-08-17 vs New York Liberty W 56 - 43
2000-08-20 @ New York Liberty L 45 - 51
2000-08-21 @ New York Liberty L 67 - 81

2000 Roster

Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Eva Nemcova F 12 31.2 13.5 2.9 1.6 1.1 0.3 - 11.2 - 10 14 0.7 1.1 42.2 44.1 91.7 0.13 55.6 51.9
Chasity Melvin C 26 26.9 11.2 5.5 1.7 1.0 0.6 - 8.8 - -9 38 -0.2 -0.4 45.6 0.0 74.5 0.41 52.5 45.6
Merlakia Jones G 26 28.2 10.5 3.9 1.8 0.8 0.0 - 9.6 - 18 38 0.5 0.8 48.4 29.4 67.7 0.74 51.8 50.4
Rushia Brown F 26 22.3 8.8 4.3 1.3 1.4 0.4 - 6.1 - -88 36 -2.4 -4.9 53.5 0 83.3 -1.53 60.3 53.5
Mery Andrade F 26 24.9 7.8 3.1 2.5 1.3 0.3 - 6.0 - -169 38 -4.4 -8.1 41.7 30.6 75.7 -2.2 54.1 47.8
Ann Wauters - 25 17.8 6.0 3.7 0.9 0.6 0.5 - 4.6 - -37 37 -1.0 -1.9 48.7 0.0 78.7 -0.42 54.9 48.7
Suzie McConnell Serio G 26 21.1 5.0 1.5 3.5 0.5 0.0 - 4.1 - 58 38 1.5 3.8 39.3 36.7 72.7 1.76 55.3 52.8
Helen Darling - 25 17.8 4.8 2.1 2.1 1.2 0.1 - 5.0 - -55 37 -1.5 -2.8 30.2 32.3 73.9 -0.2 41.0 34.1
Vicki Hall F 25 16.7 4.3 2.8 0.7 0.6 0.2 - 4.8 - 62 37 1.7 3.6 33.3 23.5 63.3 2.02 40.2 36.7
Michelle Edwards - 3 5.6 2.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 - 3.3 - 120 23 5.2 9.7 40.0 0.0 0 -0.36 40.0 40.0
Tricia Bader Binford - 19 7.6 1.8 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.0 - 1.6 - 11 29 0.4 1.4 38.7 40.0 83.3 0.34 52.0 48.4
Pollyanna Johns Kimbrough - 7 4.3 1.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 1.1 - -29 16 -1.8 -8.0 50.0 0 100.0 -0.08 61.5 50.0
Adia Barnes - 3 3.5 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.7 - - - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 17.4 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG