๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Charlotte

Also known as: Charlotte
Program History

2003 Team Stats (36 games)

53.2
PPG
-
Opp
-
Margin
42.0%
FG%
37.3%
3P%
77.6%
FT%
22.9
RPG
11.7
APG
10.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
62.4
Adj PPG
62.1
Adj Opp PPG
#8
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2003
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 874 (#14) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1000 (#9) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +102 elo More โ†’ 962 (#10) HCA +102 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +4.2 More โ†’ +0.3 (#8) HCA +4.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +4.4 More โ†’ -0.4 (#9) HCA +4.4
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.517 (#7) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +0.4 More โ†’ 0.513 (#6) AdjNet +0.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +0.5 More โ†’ 0.513 (#6) AdjNet +0.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 62.4 | AdjD 62.1 More โ†’ 0.506 (#8) AdjO 62.4 | AdjD 62.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.9 | AdjD 63.2 More โ†’ 0.492 (#9) AdjO 62.9 | AdjD 63.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.456 (#11) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.453 (#11) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 100 | GP 36 More โ†’ 957 (#11) RD 100 | GP 36

2003 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2003-05-23 vs Washington Mystics L 70 - 74
2003-05-28 vs Indiana Fever W 66 - 57
2003-05-31 @ Detroit Shock W 70 - 67
2003-06-04 vs San Antonio Silver Stars W 67 - 52
2003-06-06 vs Houston Comets W 69 - 58
2003-06-07 @ Cleveland Rockers L 57 - 67
2003-06-11 @ Phoenix Mercury W 58 - 50
2003-06-14 @ San Antonio Silver Stars L 52 - 62
2003-06-17 @ Indiana Fever L 60 - 71
2003-06-20 vs Minnesota Lynx W 76 - 72
2003-06-22 @ New York Liberty L 57 - 69
2003-06-25 vs Cleveland Rockers W 61 - 50
2003-06-28 vs Connecticut Sun W 69 - 55
2003-06-30 vs Seattle Storm L 71 - 83
2003-07-03 @ Detroit Shock W 92 - 79
2003-07-05 vs Sacramento Monarchs W 67 - 65
2003-07-07 @ Washington Mystics W 62 - 56
2003-07-10 vs Detroit Shock W 65 - 58
2003-07-17 @ Washington Mystics L 60 - 68
2003-07-18 @ New York Liberty L 48 - 56
2003-07-20 vs Cleveland Rockers L 57 - 59
2003-07-23 vs Detroit Shock W 67 - 61
2003-07-26 @ Connecticut Sun L 70 - 74
2003-07-31 @ Seattle Storm L 54 - 69
2003-08-02 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 84 - 73
2003-08-03 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 60 - 76
2003-08-07 vs New York Liberty W 65 - 54
2003-08-09 vs Connecticut Sun W 69 - 68
2003-08-14 vs Washington Mystics L 69 - 76
2003-08-16 @ Indiana Fever L 63 - 69
2003-08-20 vs Indiana Fever W 80 - 50
2003-08-22 @ Connecticut Sun L 55 - 63
2003-08-24 vs New York Liberty W 61 - 59
2003-08-25 @ Cleveland Rockers L 66 - 75
2003-08-28 @ Connecticut Sun L 66 - 68
2003-08-30 vs Connecticut Sun L 62 - 68

2003 Roster

No roster data available for this season.

2003 Shot Zones

1944 located field-goal attempts in 36 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Stinson21% Sutton-Brown22% Feaster25% Miller29% Stinson34% Feaster47% Feaster50% Feaster36% Feaster24% Feaster42%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Sutton-Brown27% Stinson15% Miller23% Feaster25% Feaster24% Feaster37% Feaster36% Feaster51% Feaster31% Feaster34%
Misses: who misses most here

Allison FeasterAndrea StinsonTammy Sutton-BrownKelly Miller

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 351-669 52.5 702 Andrea Stinson 21% (146 pts) Tammy Sutton-Brown 18% (124 pts) Tammy Sutton-Brown 27% (87 misses) Andrea Stinson 15% (48 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 127-335 37.9 254 Tammy Sutton-Brown 22% (56 pts) Andrea Stinson 19% (48 pts) Andrea Stinson 15% (31 misses) Tammy Sutton-Brown 14% (29 misses)
Mid-range left 55-188 29.3 110 Allison Feaster 25% (28 pts) Andrea Stinson 25% (28 pts) Kelly Miller 23% (30 misses) Allison Feaster 21% (28 misses)
Mid-range center 28-68 41.2 56 Kelly Miller 29% (16 pts) Allison Feaster 25% (14 pts) Allison Feaster 25% (10 misses) Andrea Stinson 25% (10 misses)
Mid-range right 53-179 29.6 106 Andrea Stinson 34% (36 pts) Allison Feaster 25% (26 pts) Allison Feaster 24% (30 misses) Andrea Stinson 21% (26 misses)
Left corner 3 19-49 38.8 57 Allison Feaster 47% (27 pts) Tanya Kostic 21% (12 pts) Allison Feaster 37% (11 misses) Kelly Miller 20% (6 misses)
Right corner 3 12-26 46.2 36 Allison Feaster 50% (18 pts) Andrea Stinson 17% (6 pts) Allison Feaster 36% (5 misses) Andrea Stinson 29% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 left 83-195 42.6 249 Allison Feaster 36% (90 pts) Tanya Kostic 18% (45 pts) Allison Feaster 51% (57 misses) Andrea Stinson 16% (18 misses)
Above-break 3 center 33-85 38.8 99 Allison Feaster 24% (24 pts) Shalonda Enis 21% (21 pts) Allison Feaster 31% (16 misses) Shalonda Enis 19% (10 misses)
Above-break 3 right 50-150 33.3 150 Allison Feaster 42% (63 pts) Shalonda Enis 20% (30 pts) Allison Feaster 34% (34 misses) Andrea Stinson 19% (19 misses)