Charlotte
2000 Team Stats (25 games)
68.0
PPG
76.1
Opp
-8.1
Margin
42.6%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
73.1%
FT%
28.5
RPG
17.6
APG
-
TO
-
Est. poss./game
66.7
Adj PPG
74.3
Adj Opp PPG
#15
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2000
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 760 (#16) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 797 (#15) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 861 (#14) | HCA +110 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -7.9 (#15) | HCA +3.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -7.6 (#15) | HCA +4.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.229 (#15) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.220 (#15) | AdjNet -11.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.219 (#15) | AdjNet -11.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.334 (#15) | AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 74.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.346 (#15) | AdjO 65.7 | AdjD 72.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.260 (#15) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.263 (#15) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 782 (#16) | RD 105 | GP 32 |
2000 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-06-01 | @ | Connecticut Sun | L | 79 - 82 |
| 2000-06-03 | vs | Miami Sol | L | 63 - 74 |
| 2000-06-05 | vs | Cleveland Rockers | L | 53 - 69 |
| 2000-06-09 | vs | Seattle Storm | L | 62 - 67 |
| 2000-06-10 | vs | Connecticut Sun | L | 71 - 74 |
| 2000-06-12 | @ | Dallas Wings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-06-15 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 68 - 96 |
| 2000-06-17 | @ | Sacramento Monarchs | L | 63 - 74 |
| 2000-06-18 | @ | Los Angeles Sparks | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-06-20 | @ | Portland Fire | W | 87 - 85 |
| 2000-06-22 | vs | Phoenix Mercury | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-06-24 | @ | Connecticut Sun | L | 68 - 69 |
| 2000-06-25 | vs | Dallas Wings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-06-28 | vs | Houston Comets | L | 66 - 76 |
| 2000-07-01 | vs | Washington Mystics | L | 74 - 78 |
| 2000-07-05 | vs | Miami Sol | W | 76 - 70 |
| 2000-07-07 | @ | Houston Comets | L | 71 - 86 |
| 2000-07-08 | vs | Cleveland Rockers | L | 59 - 80 |
| 2000-07-10 | @ | Cleveland Rockers | L | 65 - 72 |
| 2000-07-12 | @ | New York Liberty | L | 70 - 84 |
| 2000-07-15 | @ | Washington Mystics | W | 76 - 73 |
| 2000-07-21 | vs | Portland Fire | W | 73 - 64 |
| 2000-07-22 | @ | Indiana Fever | L | 59 - 80 |
| 2000-07-24 | vs | Indiana Fever | W | 82 - 78 |
| 2000-07-26 | vs | Washington Mystics | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-07-28 | vs | New York Liberty | L | 56 - 66 |
| 2000-07-29 | @ | Dallas Wings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-07-31 | @ | New York Liberty | L | 56 - 81 |
| 2000-08-04 | @ | Miami Sol | - | Incomplete score |
| 2000-08-05 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | W | 84 - 82 |
| 2000-08-08 | vs | Minnesota Lynx | L | 67 - 75 |
| 2000-08-09 | @ | Indiana Fever | L | 51 - 67 |
2000 Roster
Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Stinson | G | 25 | 35.0 | 17.3 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 | - | 14.4 | - | 208 | 32 | 6.5 | 9.2 | 45.7 | 36.1 | 72.7 | 1.01 | 53.4 | 49.9 |
| Rhonda Mapp | C | 23 | 28.7 | 12.0 | 6.4 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | - | 10.1 | - | 154 | 30 | 5.1 | 9.3 | 47.4 | 38.9 | 79.4 | 0.54 | 53.3 | 48.9 |
| Shalonda Enis | F | 9 | 27.4 | 11.9 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | - | 9.0 | - | 98 | 12 | 8.2 | 14.2 | 39.5 | 37.0 | 73.3 | 0.67 | 53.1 | 45.7 |
| Dawn Staley | G | 25 | 34.1 | 9.0 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | - | 8.2 | - | 189 | 32 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 37.3 | 34.7 | 86.8 | 0.78 | 49.3 | 43.6 |
| Tracy Reid | F | 23 | 21.9 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | - | 6.1 | - | 157 | 29 | 5.4 | 11.4 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 56.2 | 1.2 | 52.3 | 50.0 |
| Tiffany Travis | F | 25 | 17.5 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | - | 5.1 | - | 138 | 32 | 4.3 | 10.3 | 43.8 | 47.4 | 65.0 | 1.17 | 49.0 | 47.3 |
| Charlotte Smith | F | 24 | 21.7 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | - | 5.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.8 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 47.0 | 44.3 |
| Niesa Johnson | - | 5 | 13.4 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | 2.8 | - | 32 | 6 | 5.3 | 13.1 | 57.1 | 40.0 | 100.0 | 0.59 | 72.1 | 64.3 |
| Angie Braziel | F | 17 | 10.5 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | 2.8 | - | 55 | 22 | 2.5 | 10.3 | 40.4 | 0 | 70.6 | 0.62 | 45.9 | 40.4 |
| Cass Bauer-Bilodeau | F | 22 | 14.1 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | - | 2.5 | - | 133 | 29 | 4.6 | 17.9 | 38.2 | 0.0 | 94.1 | 1.62 | 46.4 | 38.2 |
| Larecha Jones | - | 7 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | - | 2.1 | - | 11 | 9 | 1.2 | 7.4 | 46.7 | 40.0 | 0 | -0.01 | 53.3 | 53.3 |
| Summer Erb | - | 23 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | 2.0 | - | 106 | 29 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 57.1 | 1.04 | 38.7 | 33.3 |
| E.C. Hill | - | 22 | 8.4 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | 2.3 | - | 126 | 26 | 4.8 | 19.7 | 28.0 | 23.8 | 66.7 | 1.43 | 34.1 | 33.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG