Bridgeport
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 971 (#351) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 976 (#308) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 931 (#581) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -10.4 (#247) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -9.0 (#501) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.139 (#513) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.386 (#304) | NetEff -3.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.048 (#630) | AdjNet -25.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.047 (#630) | AdjNet -25.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.219 (#609) | AdjO 49.5 | AdjD 63.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.366 (#566) | AdjO 50.0 | AdjD 56.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.278 (#541) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.290 (#539) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 888 (#390) | RD 102 | GP 19 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Roberts Wesleyan | W | 63 - 53 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Queens (NY) | L | 44 - 57 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Wilmington (DE) | W | 57 - 43 |
| 2025-11-30 | @ | Southern N.H. | L | 38 - 71 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Post | W | 65 - 42 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Jefferson | L | 61 - 63 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Georgian Court | W | 64 - 53 |
| 2025-12-16 | @ | Pace | W | 62 - 53 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Southern Conn. St. | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Goldey-Beacom | W | 66 - 58 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Chestnut Hill | L | 54 - 79 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Dominican (NY) | L | 34 - 54 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Holy Family | L | 36 - 54 |
| 2026-01-20 | vs | Felician | W | 60 - 44 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Wilmington (DE) | W | 74 - 47 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Post | L | 44 - 60 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Jefferson | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2026-02-03 | vs | St. Thomas Aquinas | L | 39 - 44 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Georgian Court | L | 44 - 51 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savannah Prescott | - | 18 | 34.7 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 18 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 29.2 | 23.7 | 57.9 | -0.18 | 38.0 | 32.5 |
| Karolina Andersson | - | 8 | 29.7 | 9.5 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 10.0 | 8.2 | -23 | -2.9 | -40.3 | 36.2 | 24.5 | 66.7 | -1.05 | 45.3 | 43.8 |
| Zahkiyyah Frazier | - | 18 | 27.1 | 7.9 | 9.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 11.2 | -21 | -1.0 | -6.7 | 56.6 | 0.0 | 37.5 | -3.72 | 54.7 | 56.6 |
| Jaelyn Choi | - | 15 | 22.6 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 7.6 | 3.1 | 42 | 2.6 | 20.9 | 34.2 | 25.8 | 63.2 | 0.81 | 43.7 | 41.7 |
| Niyah Whitten | - | 18 | 31.5 | 6.6 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 7.8 | 2.3 | 11 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 27.0 | 27.8 | 69.0 | -0.67 | 38.4 | 34.8 |
| Nicole Benini | - | 18 | 23.7 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 25 | 1.3 | 7.1 | 33.3 | 29.1 | 71.4 | 0.68 | 44.3 | 40.4 |
| Isabella Edwards | - | 11 | 11.6 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | -14 | -1.2 | -9.2 | 38.5 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0.57 | 43.4 | 43.3 |
| India Lee | - | 14 | 10.3 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.1 | 2.5 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.6 | 35.1 | 46.2 | 73.3 | 1.28 | 44.8 | 40.4 |
| Laia Albas | - | 15 | 9.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.9 | -60 | -3.8 | -47.0 | 26.7 | 20.7 | 57.1 | -0.02 | 35.4 | 33.3 |
| Alycia Secchiaroli | - | 17 | 11.5 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 2.2 | -14 | -0.8 | -12.2 | 31.2 | 16.7 | 35.7 | -2.22 | 33.2 | 32.3 |
| Mireya Johnson | - | 16 | 12.1 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 0.3 | -1 | -0.1 | -0.8 | 26.5 | 16.7 | 23.1 | 1.35 | 28.3 | 28.6 |
| Merci Turner | - | 8 | 10.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.1 | -20 | -2.5 | -41.0 | 28.6 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -1.45 | 43.7 | 42.9 |
| Adalise Caraballo | - | 4 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0.0 | - | 21.8 | 25.0 |
| Marcela Banuelos | - | 2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Marta Cutazzo | - | 1 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG