Bluefield St.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1118 (#89) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 995 (#181) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1126 (#52) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.4 (#213) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +7.9 (#191) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.489 (#175) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.526 (#243) | NetEff +1.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.557 (#210) | AdjNet +2.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.560 (#212) | AdjNet +2.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.545 (#207) | AdjO 83.1 | AdjD 81.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.606 (#139) | AdjO 73.1 | AdjD 68.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.706 (#134) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.697 (#136) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1199 (#49) | RD 155 | GP 5 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Virginia Union | W | 75 - 57 |
| 2026-01-23 | vs | Lincoln (PA) | W | 65 - 62 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Virginia St. | L | 59 - 60 |
| 2026-02-02 | vs | Concord | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Bowie St. | W | 75 - 73 |
| 2026-02-09 | @ | Bowie St. | W | 63 - 54 |
| 2026-02-11 | vs | Virginia St. | L | 48 - 65 |
| 2026-02-14 | @ | Lincoln (PA) | W | 73 - 67 |
| 2026-02-18 | @ | Virginia Union | L | 50 - 57 |
| 2026-02-21 | vs | Elizabeth City St. | W | 72 - 51 |
| 2026-02-25 | vs | Winston-Salem | W | 65 - 55 |
| 2026-02-26 | @ | Claflin | W | 70 - 68 |
| 2026-02-27 | @ | Virginia St. | W | 71 - 66 |
| 2026-02-28 | @ | Fayetteville St. | L | 68 - 71 |
| 2026-03-27 | vs | Central St. (OH) | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2026-03-28 | @ | Virginia St. | L | 66 - 69 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Davenport | - | 13 | 30.2 | 13.6 | 5.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 9.8 | 10.3 | - | - | - | - | 42.5 | 43.6 | 78.9 | - | 58.2 | 52.0 |
| Myles Pierre | - | 13 | 33.3 | 13.5 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 12.6 | 4.9 | - | - | - | - | 30.5 | 30.4 | 88.7 | - | 46.0 | 36.9 |
| Ellija Preddy | - | 13 | 38.1 | 11.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 13.4 | 5.4 | - | - | - | - | 36.8 | 20.6 | 72.7 | - | 40.0 | 38.8 |
| Warren Mouganda | - | 13 | 30.2 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 9.0 | 6.3 | - | - | - | - | 41.0 | 15.0 | 61.8 | - | 47.1 | 42.3 |
| Anthony Latty | - | 13 | 34.1 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 11.9 | - | - | - | - | 59.3 | 0 | 61.8 | - | 62.7 | 59.3 |
| Kyree Smith | - | 13 | 15.5 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - | 54.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 54.4 | 54.0 |
| Sila Tako | - | 13 | 13.4 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | - | 37.8 | 31.2 | 75.9 | - | 52.8 | 43.3 |
| Pharoah Lassiter | - | 10 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | - | - | - | - | 44.4 | 42.9 | 100.0 | - | 65.8 | 61.1 |
| Todd Dumphord II | - | 5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Josiah Watkins | - | 6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 104.2 | 100.0 |
| Maurice Crump | - | 6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
| Kemar Benn | - | 10 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 41.0 | 50.0 |
| Jalen Baker | - | 8 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | -0.1 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Izrael Everett | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Amare Haynie | - | 5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | -0.4 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Jayden Beloti | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Ernest Johnson II | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG