BYU
2021 Team Stats (6 games)
72.3
PPG
75.6
Opp
-1.3
Margin
46.0%
FG%
31.7%
3P%
77.8%
FT%
37.7
RPG
11.7
APG
15.2
TO
80.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1564 (#18) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1431 (#37) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +37.8 (#30) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.296 (#69) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.762 (#23) | AdjNet +10.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.764 (#23) | AdjNet +10.2 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-26 | vs | New Orleans Privateers | W | 86 - 61 |
| 2020-12-18 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 72 - 62 |
| 2021-01-07 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 69 - 86 |
| 2021-02-08 | vs | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 71 - 82 |
| 2021-03-08 | vs | Pepperdine Waves | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2021-03-09 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 78 - 88 |
| 2021-03-20 | vs | UCLA Bruins | L | 62 - 73 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Barcello
|
G | 6 | 34.7 | 18.2 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 13.8 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 48.2 | 37.9 | 94.7 | - | 59.7 | 54.8 |
B. Averette
|
G | 7 | 27.1 | 11.4 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 9.0 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 29.6 | 77.8 | - | 59.7 | 49.2 |
M. Haarms
|
F | 6 | 24.3 | 10.8 | 5.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 61.0 | 33.3 | 87.5 | - | 67.7 | 62.2 |
C. Lohner
|
- | 6 | 29.3 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 9.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 30.0 | 66.7 | - | 57.0 | 54.7 |
Trevin Knell
|
- | 7 | 15.0 | 6.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 43.5 | 60.0 | - | 73.0 | 60.0 |
R. Harward
|
C | 7 | 14.9 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 86.1 | 60.0 |
Spencer Johnson
|
- | 7 | 21.1 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 36.7 | 29.4 | 62.5 | - | 49.2 | 45.0 |
G. George
|
- | 7 | 15.6 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 25.0 | 60.0 | - | 49.7 | 44.8 |
C. Harding
|
G | 5 | 16.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 90.0 | - | 35.3 | 14.3 |
K. Lee
|
- | 4 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 39.8 | 40.0 |
G. Baxter
|
F | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
W. Lowell
|
- | 2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG