Army Black Knights
2026 Team Stats (29 games)
63.1
PPG
55.7
Opp
+7.4
Margin
40.5%
FG%
31.6%
3P%
74.6%
FT%
33.8
RPG
14.5
APG
12.8
TO
75.2
Pace
63.1
AdjO
61.5
AdjD
#143
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1230 (#48) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1150 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1111 (#56) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.4 (#144) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +14.9 (#137) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.823 (#63) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.831 (#69) | NetEff +12.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.599 (#141) | AdjNet +3.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.593 (#142) | AdjNet +3.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.537 (#143) | AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 61.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.627 (#111) | AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 57.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.812 (#130) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.792 (#125) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1160 (#92) | RD 101 | GP 29 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Smith
|
F | 29 | 32.9 | 13.8 | 10.6 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 17.3 | 79 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 51.2 | 41.2 | 67.3 | 2.95 | 57.2 | 52.5 |
C. Tade
|
G | 29 | 32.1 | 13.5 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 58 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 46.7 | 38.6 | 87.5 | -0.03 | 57.7 | 52.3 |
R. Ericson
|
G | 29 | 33.7 | 10.4 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 9.5 | 5.1 | 41 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 37.8 | 37.2 | 72.0 | -0.24 | 53.0 | 51.8 |
T. Wilson
|
G | 28 | 27.2 | 7.6 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 6.0 | 12 | 3.0 | 41.7 | 35.9 | 23.3 | 86.0 | 0.72 | 45.1 | 40.6 |
R. Reardon
|
F | 28 | 18.4 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 3.7 | 109 | 5.0 | 11.9 | 41.8 | 20.0 | 68.2 | 2.41 | 46.8 | 43.7 |
B. Wilson
|
G | 29 | 24.4 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 5.5 | -5 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 32.8 | 29.8 | 81.0 | -1.34 | 48.1 | 38.4 |
S. Montrose
|
G | 29 | 12.4 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 61 | 2.8 | 9.7 | 35.4 | 33.3 | 56.2 | 1.35 | 44.3 | 42.9 |
F. Hastick
|
G | 23 | 16.8 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 2.4 | -4 | -0.3 | -0.9 | 30.9 | 20.5 | 80.0 | 0.58 | 37.3 | 35.8 |
S. Chartrand
|
G | 14 | 7.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 27 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 2.06 | 30.7 | 25.0 |
A. Annee
|
G | 13 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 18 | 1.4 | 9.4 | 15.4 | 16.7 | 75.0 | 0.25 | 30.5 | 23.1 |
J. Preston
|
F | 8 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 5 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.25 | 10.2 | 0.0 |
S. Tillson
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K. Cramer
|
G | 9 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | -0.3 | 7 | 0.9 | 16.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
L. Sherrer
|
G | 3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | -1.0 | 5 | 1.7 | 42.6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG