Allen
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1022 (#207) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1038 (#213) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1066 (#111) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -1.7 (#193) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +2.9 (#316) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.533 (#348) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.691 (#219) | NetEff +5.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.322 (#462) | AdjNet -6.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.320 (#464) | AdjNet -6.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.413 (#459) | AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 67.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.523 (#304) | AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 68.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.560 (#305) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.566 (#293) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1079 (#168) | RD 107 | GP 20 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Kentucky St. | W | 66 - 57 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Central St. (OH) | W | 77 - 56 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Fort Valley St. | W | 80 - 65 |
| 2025-12-01 | @ | Charleston So. | L | 62 - 83 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Lane | W | 75 - 74 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | LeMoyne-Owen | W | 98 - 58 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Tuskegee | L | 50 - 62 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Miles | L | 52 - 75 |
| 2025-12-17 | vs | Albany St. (GA) | L | 79 - 81 |
| 2025-12-18 | vs | Lander | W | 75 - 73 |
| 2025-12-19 | vs | Spring Hill | W | 72 - 58 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Fort Valley St. | W | 89 - 39 |
| 2026-01-05 | @ | Clark Atlanta | L | 76 - 94 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Edward Waters | L | 68 - 70 |
| 2026-01-19 | @ | Savannah St. | W | 68 - 66 |
| 2026-01-19 | vs | Benedict | W | 81 - 78 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Kentucky St. | W | 74 - 68 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Central St. (OH) | W | 77 - 57 |
| 2026-01-30 | @ | Lane | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | LeMoyne-Owen | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Tuskegee | W | 69 - 56 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Miles | L | 61 - 75 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peighton Jambor | - | 17 | 25.7 | 15.1 | 6.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 11.3 | 10.1 | - | - | - | 51.6 | 27.6 | 83.3 | - | 58.6 | 53.6 |
| Anissa Tuitt | - | 7 | 28.7 | 11.3 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 8.1 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 47.4 | 44.4 | 68.4 | - | 60.4 | 57.9 |
| Morgan Smith | - | 15 | 18.1 | 11.1 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 9.8 | 7.3 | 123 | 5.6 | 17.7 | 43.5 | 35.3 | 77.8 | 1.24 | 52.6 | 49.7 |
| Eboni Clay | - | 20 | 30.4 | 10.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 9.3 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 38.0 | 29.1 | 86.8 | - | 50.2 | 44.1 |
| Jasmine Norman | - | 20 | 20.6 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 8.1 | 3.2 | -12 | -1.0 | -51.2 | 30.2 | 30.5 | 66.7 | -0.8 | 40.7 | 40.1 |
| Amaris Ridgeway | - | 16 | 17.2 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 43.4 | 19.2 | 64.7 | - | 51.1 | 46.7 |
| Destini Gooddine | - | 19 | 11.5 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 41.0 | 25.6 | 66.7 | - | 51.5 | 47.6 |
| Kassadi King | - | 20 | 21.1 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.7 | 6.2 | 97 | 4.6 | 18.7 | 42.6 | 12.5 | 60.0 | 2.62 | 47.0 | 43.1 |
| Daiysha Brown | - | 12 | 16.9 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 40.9 | 35.7 | 70.6 | - | 51.5 | 46.6 |
| Macy Brackett | - | 17 | 15.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 44.3 | 0.0 | 64.7 | - | 47.5 | 44.3 |
| Tanaja Kennedy | - | 11 | 21.1 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 20.0 | 63.2 | - | 43.4 | 37.5 |
| Amira Roy | - | 15 | 9.4 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 53.2 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 54.4 | 53.2 |
| Jamicia Davis | - | 18 | 10.5 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 39 | 1.9 | 8.5 | 25.6 | 28.6 | 61.0 | 3.98 | 43.0 | 30.8 |
| Kyla Thomas | - | 15 | 7.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 39.5 | 0.0 | 60.0 | - | 42.5 | 39.5 |
| Auak Jok | - | 12 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 38.1 | 28.6 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG