Allegheny
Also known as: Allegheny
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 954 (#401) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 936 (#375) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 940 (#570) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.9 (#424) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.163 (#503) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.163 (#377) | NetEff -11.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.550 (#385) | AdjNet +1.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.535 (#398) | AdjNet +1.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.515 (#397) | AdjO 64.4 | AdjD 63.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.420 (#506) | AdjO 60.7 | AdjD 64.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.389 (#457) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.410 (#440) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 872 (#412) | RD 314 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eyra Co | - | 1 | 34.5 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 60.0 | 0 | - | 65.4 | 65.4 |
| Jess Bickart | - | 1 | 38.9 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 16.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 27.3 | 0 | - | 40.6 | 40.6 |
| Sarah Santicola | - | 1 | 34.3 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 17.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 46.7 | 42.9 |
| Ava Kobus | - | 1 | 27.5 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 40.5 | 33.3 |
| Isabella Antonacci | - | 1 | 38.8 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 32.2 | 25.0 |
| Kate Leach | - | 1 | 17.9 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 64.4 | 66.7 |
| Ashlan Price | - | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 59 | 5.4 | 26.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.16 | 0 | 0 |
| Bella Wilson | - | 1 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG