Alabama A&M Bulldogs
2026 Team Stats (33 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1004 (#173) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1012 (#174) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1101 (#61) | HCA +106 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -5.9 (#235) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -4.8 (#219) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.598 (#136) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.598 (#136) | NetEff +2.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.289 (#226) | AdjNet -7.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.278 (#229) | AdjNet -8.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.384 (#232) | AdjO 55.4 | AdjD 60.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.506 (#160) | AdjO 57.6 | AdjD 57.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.446 (#191) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.470 (#184) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1035 (#153) | RD 117 | GP 30 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Walker
|
G | 28 | 33.6 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 205 | 24 | 8.5 | 10.3 | 41.4 | 33.3 | 87.0 | 3.06 | 59.7 | 50.0 |
Moses Davenport
|
C | 27 | 23.0 | 10.1 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 41 | 22 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 55.7 | 9.1 | 61.3 | 1.36 | 57.8 | 55.9 |
Coriah Beck
|
G | 26 | 27.6 | 9.4 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 8.5 | 5.2 | 120 | 23 | 5.2 | 7.8 | 34.5 | 28.1 | 63.6 | 0.59 | 45.9 | 40.2 |
Jaida Belton
|
F | 33 | 19.8 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 5.9 | 9.7 | 134 | 28 | 4.8 | 10.0 | 50.0 | 66.7 | 57.1 | 2.66 | 53.0 | 50.5 |
Aniya Palmer
|
G | 33 | 21.2 | 7.5 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 118 | 28 | 4.2 | 8.1 | 41.7 | 0.0 | 64.3 | 1.47 | 46.1 | 41.7 |
Rakiyah Beal
|
G | 33 | 23.3 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 7.1 | 2.7 | 94 | 28 | 3.4 | 5.8 | 34.0 | 26.9 | 57.1 | -0.96 | 41.6 | 37.9 |
Amber Scott
|
G | 10 | 12.4 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.2 | -33 | 8 | -4.1 | -12.3 | 37.9 | 14.3 | 66.7 | -1.78 | 47.4 | 39.7 |
Kamiyha Griffin
|
G | 32 | 11.2 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 1.9 | -62 | 27 | -2.3 | -8.6 | 40.9 | 20.0 | 55.0 | -5.35 | 45.5 | 42.0 |
Vanessa Wimberly
|
G | 33 | 24.1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 3.8 | -30 | 28 | -1.1 | -1.9 | 21.4 | 18.4 | 73.7 | -4.57 | 37.8 | 26.0 |
Zaria Glover
|
G | 9 | 11.4 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.2 | -24 | 7 | -3.4 | -11.5 | 25.9 | 11.1 | 66.7 | -3.38 | 35.6 | 27.8 |
Kalyn Ervin
|
G | 23 | 7.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1 | 19 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 47.1 | 44.4 | 80.0 | -2.63 | 62.5 | 58.8 |
Sumayah McIntosh
|
G | 33 | 13.2 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0.6 | -70 | 28 | -2.5 | -7.6 | 26.6 | 10.7 | 48.0 | -6.08 | 31.0 | 28.2 |
Shelomi Sanders
|
G | 15 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 0.1 | -37 | 12 | -3.1 | -27.8 | 22.2 | 20.0 | 50.0 | -5.98 | 31.3 | 29.6 |
Tre'Miyah Berry
|
G | 17 | 6.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | -0.3 | 6 | 13 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 17.4 | 14.3 | 75.0 | -0.64 | 26.3 | 21.7 |
C. Whitehead
|
F | 8 | 3.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 7 | 6 | 1.2 | 24.3 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.13 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Kourtney Rittenberry
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
1777 located field-goal attempts in 33 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
K. WalkerMoses DavenportJaida BeltonAniya PalmerRakiyah BealCoriah BeckVanessa Wimberly
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 240-407 | 59.0 | 480 | Jaida Belton 21% (102 pts) | Moses Davenport 19% (90 pts) | Jaida Belton 22% (37 misses) | Aniya Palmer 14% (23 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 242-602 | 40.2 | 484 | Moses Davenport 21% (102 pts) | Aniya Palmer 19% (92 pts) | Aniya Palmer 19% (68 misses) | Jaida Belton 14% (52 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 39-111 | 35.1 | 78 | Rakiyah Beal 36% (28 pts) | Aniya Palmer 21% (16 pts) | Rakiyah Beal 39% (28 misses) | Aniya Palmer 12% (9 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 19-59 | 32.2 | 38 | Moses Davenport 21% (8 pts) | Rakiyah Beal 21% (8 pts) | Aniya Palmer 35% (14 misses) | Rakiyah Beal 18% (7 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 42-125 | 33.6 | 84 | Moses Davenport 24% (20 pts) | K. Walker 21% (18 pts) | K. Walker 18% (15 misses) | Rakiyah Beal 16% (13 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 10-46 | 21.7 | 30 | Rakiyah Beal 50% (15 pts) | Coriah Beck 20% (6 pts) | Vanessa Wimberly 31% (11 misses) | Rakiyah Beal 25% (9 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 4-29 | 13.8 | 12 | K. Walker 25% (3 pts) | Kalyn Ervin 25% (3 pts) | Vanessa Wimberly 24% (6 misses) | K. Walker 20% (5 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 45-154 | 29.2 | 135 | Coriah Beck 33% (45 pts) | K. Walker 29% (39 pts) | K. Walker 27% (29 misses) | Coriah Beck 25% (27 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 16-75 | 21.3 | 48 | K. Walker 69% (33 pts) | Coriah Beck 6% (3 pts) | K. Walker 44% (26 misses) | Vanessa Wimberly 12% (7 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 45-169 | 26.6 | 135 | K. Walker 40% (54 pts) | Coriah Beck 16% (21 pts) | K. Walker 23% (29 misses) | Coriah Beck 22% (27 misses) |