🐻⬇️🏀

Akron

Season: 2026 2013
Also known as: Akron
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1055 (#232) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1011 (#363) HCA +62 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +32.7 (#64) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 1.000 (#71) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +65.9 More → 1.000 (#51) NetEff +65.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +48.5 More → 0.997 (#80) AdjNet +48.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +49.2 More → 0.998 (#76) AdjNet +49.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 89.5 | AdjD 51.0 More → 0.971 (#49) AdjO 89.5 | AdjD 51.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 82.7 | AdjD 57.6 More → 0.907 (#14) AdjO 82.7 | AdjD 57.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.935 (#38) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.917 (#43) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 301 | GP 1 More → 1081 (#207) RD 301 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-12-03 vs Heidelberg W 117 - 34
2025-12-16 vs Geneva W 100 - 65

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Izzy Callaway - 2 28.7 26.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 14.5 16.5 - - - 62.1 61.1 100.0 - 83.8 81.0
Ni'Rah Clark - 1 30.7 21.0 11.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 11.0 21.0 -12 -0.7 -9.2 72.7 0 100.0 2.11 79.5 72.7
Liz Murphy - 2 18.0 16.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 10.0 11.5 - - - 45.0 23.1 100.0 - 65.3 52.5
Keiryn McGuff - 1 19.0 12.0 11.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 11.0 15.0 - - - 27.3 0.0 85.7 - 42.6 27.3
Shaena Brew - 2 21.2 11.5 5.5 4.0 1.5 0.0 2.5 6.5 13.5 - - - 61.5 0.0 70.0 - 66.1 61.5
Corinne Reed - 2 24.9 10.5 6.0 2.5 1.5 0.0 3.5 6.0 11.0 - - - 66.7 33.3 50.0 - 67.7 70.8
Monique Mitchell - 2 17.1 10.0 8.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 10.0 10.5 - - - 40.0 11.1 75.0 - 46.0 42.5
Natalie Johnson - 2 16.6 8.5 5.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 6.5 7.0 - - - 53.8 33.3 50.0 - 57.6 57.7
Ella Wigal - 2 14.5 3.5 7.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 2.0 6.5 6.0 - - - 23.1 10.0 0 - 26.9 26.9
Liisa Taponen - 2 15.7 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.0 3.0 - - - 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Teniesha Clarke - 2 11.7 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 1.5 3.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 100.0 - 51.5 33.3
Maddie Vejsicky - 2 6.9 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG