🐻⬇️🏀

Akron

Season: 2026 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018
Also known as: Akron
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1087 (#120) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More → 988 (#348) HCA +95 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +44.5 (#3) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.999 (#14) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +35.2 More → 0.984 (#33) AdjNet +35.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +33.5 More → 0.982 (#36) AdjNet +33.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 96.7 | AdjD 66.7 More → 0.939 (#22) AdjO 96.7 | AdjD 66.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 92.1 | AdjD 70.1 More → 0.881 (#3) AdjO 92.1 | AdjD 70.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.932 (#3) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.915 (#3) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 266 | GP 1 More → 1154 (#75) RD 266 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-12-29 vs Concord W 115 - 64

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Tavari Johnson - 1 25.3 28.0 3.0 6.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 71 3.7 43.4 55.0 44.4 100.0 2.38 67.0 65.0
Evan Mahaffey - 1 22.8 18.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 7.0 21.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 75.0 - 102.7 107.1
Amani Lyles - 1 21.3 12.0 7.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 17.0 - - - 71.4 33.3 50.0 - 76.1 78.6
Shammah Scott - 1 20.2 12.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 11.0 7.0 -144 -6.3 -29.5 36.4 25.0 100.0 -0.1 48.7 40.9
Sharron Young - 1 21.1 9.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 4.0 - - - 57.1 33.3 0 - 64.3 64.3
Bowen Hardman - 1 17.2 8.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 5.0 - - - 28.6 33.3 100.0 - 50.8 42.9
Zach Halligan - 1 19.2 6.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Marvin Musiime-Kamali - 1 18.7 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Ognjen Stankovic - 1 9.6 6.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 12.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Rich Brisco - 1 3.6 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Eric Mahaffey - 1 18.1 4.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 106.4 100.0
Conner Groce - 1 2.9 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG