๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Akron Zips

Also known as: Akron Zips
Program History

2017 Team Stats (2 games)

46.0
PPG
73.0
Opp
-27.0
Margin
27.9%
FG%
22.2%
3P%
57.1%
FT%
35.0
RPG
9.5
APG
14.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
60.3
Adj PPG
66.7
Adj Opp PPG
#235
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2016-2017
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 727 (#299) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 839 (#274) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +87 elo More โ†’ 838 (#335) HCA +87 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ -6.7 (#237) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More โ†’ -9.7 (#271) HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.203 (#282) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -10.5 More โ†’ 0.230 (#237) AdjNet -10.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -10.6 More โ†’ 0.226 (#237) AdjNet -10.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 60.3 | AdjD 66.7 More โ†’ 0.358 (#235) AdjO 60.3 | AdjD 66.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 57.2 | AdjD 66.4 More โ†’ 0.301 (#305) AdjO 57.2 | AdjD 66.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.250 (#280) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.240 (#288) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 141 | GP 28 More โ†’ 798 (#292) RD 141 | GP 28

2017 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2016-11-12 vs Malone Pioneers W 63 - 52
2016-11-16 @ Penn State Lady Lions L 71 - 84
2016-11-20 @ Canisius Golden Griffins W 73 - 64
2016-11-30 vs Bucknell Bison L 47 - 61
2016-12-03 @ Winthrop Eagles W 80 - 59
2016-12-06 @ Youngstown State Penguins W 76 - 74
2016-12-10 @ Eastern Kentucky Colonels W 63 - 57
2016-12-17 vs Duquesne Dukes L 57 - 67
2016-12-20 @ Georgia State Panthers W 78 - 66
2016-12-21 vs Elon Phoenix L 62 - 65
2016-12-28 vs Ohio Christian Trailblazers W 69 - 52
2016-12-31 @ Western Michigan Broncos L 60 - 73
2017-01-04 @ Central Michigan Chippewas L 62 - 89
2017-01-07 vs Bowling Green Falcons L 58 - 62
2017-01-11 vs Ohio Bobcats L 69 - 85
2017-01-14 @ Ball State Cardinals L 70 - 80
2017-01-18 @ Northern Illinois Huskies W 84 - 55
2017-01-21 vs Western Michigan Broncos L 57 - 73
2017-01-28 vs Eastern Michigan Eagles W 80 - 62
2017-02-01 vs Ball State Cardinals L 63 - 90
2017-02-04 @ Bowling Green Falcons L 50 - 86
2017-02-08 @ Miami (OH) RedHawks L 49 - 54
2017-02-11 vs Kent State Golden Flashes L 58 - 72
2017-02-15 vs Toledo Rockets L 57 - 61
2017-02-18 @ Buffalo Bulls L 51 - 81
2017-02-22 vs Miami (OH) RedHawks L 62 - 66
2017-02-25 @ Kent State Golden Flashes L 69 - 73
2017-03-01 vs Buffalo Bulls L 55 - 81
2017-03-04 @ Ohio Bobcats L 48 - 62
2017-03-06 @ Toledo Rockets L 37 - 65

2017 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
H. Plybon H. Plybon G 2 28.0 14.0 3.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 9.0 7.0 - - - - 44.4 54.5 60.0 - 62.5 61.1
A. Ricketts A. Ricketts G 2 25.0 8.5 3.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.5 10.5 -0.5 - - - - 38.1 0.0 100.0 - 39.6 38.1
A. Ball A. Ball F 2 9.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 4.0 1.0 - - - - 37.5 0.0 40.0 - 39.2 37.5
S. Edmonds S. Edmonds G 2 28.0 4.0 1.0 4.5 3.0 0.0 5.5 7.0 0.0 - - - - 28.6 0.0 0 - 28.6 28.6
S. Harmon S. Harmon G 2 15.0 3.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 - - - - 25.0 33.3 100.0 - 39.4 31.2
H. Reinoehl H. Reinoehl F 2 21.0 3.5 8.5 1.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 7.5 - - - - 25.0 0.0 50.0 - 27.2 25.0
C. Vari C. Vari F 2 20.5 2.0 4.5 1.0 0.0 1.5 1.0 4.5 3.5 - - - - 11.1 0 50.0 - 18.6 11.1
B. Gordon B. Gordon G 2 9.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 - - - - 25.0 0 33.3 - 28.2 25.0
G. Burry G. Burry F 2 17.5 1.5 5.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.5 - - - - 14.3 0 100.0 - 20.2 14.3
M. Sefcik M. Sefcik G 2 17.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 7.5 -4.0 - - - - 6.7 9.1 0 - 10.0 10.0
A. Clay A. Clay G 2 3.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 - - - - 33.3 0.0 0 - 33.3 33.3
B. Kurucz B. Kurucz G 2 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 - - - - 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0
L. Hung L. Hung G 2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG